RFA No. 1885 of 2025 · Karnataka High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1885 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
MR. LESLIE D’SOUZA AGED 60 YEARS,
MRS. CANDIDA ARLENE D’SOUZA AGED MAJOR, W/O MR. LESLIE D’SOUZA, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT FLAT NO.A-200, FERM SAROJ APARTMENT, LBS NAGAR, BENGALURU–560017. (BY SRI HITESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. MANIPAL HEALTH ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT THE ANNEXE, NO.98/2, RUSTOM BAGH, HAL AIRPORT ROAD, BENGALURU-560017 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. ANEESH VINAY RAJ. MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …APPELLANTS …RESPONDENT THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE IN JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.01.2025 PASSED COM.O.S.NO.1336/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE LXXXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:32673 RFA No. 1885 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT Memo is filed seeking to withdraw the appeal. The same reads as under :
The undersigned counsel the appellants humbly submits that the Appellant seeks to withdraw the present petition is not maintainable. It is further prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the office to return of the documents filed along with the petition, in the interest of justice.
2. Memo is taken on record. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Registry is directed to return the certified copies to the appellant. Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CKL/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.