✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI SRINIVASAN N v. SRI. GOVINDARAJ, MAJOR, EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Contempt Petition No. 1024 of 2022RAJESH RAI K ORAL

Case at a glance

Bench
RAJESH RAI K ORAL
Neutral citation
2024:KHC:47088-DB

Judgment

SRI SRINIVASAN N S/O LATE K. NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS WORKING AS SANNIDHI PARICHARAKARU SRI. CHAMUNDESHWARI TEMPLE CHAMUNDI HILLS, MYSURU-570 010 R/AT D.NO. F-3, "AADYA" III MAIN, 6TH CROSS VIDYARANYAPURAM MYSURU-570 008. MAYAGAIAH VINUTHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. H.L. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: …COMPLAINANT SRI. GOVINDARAJ, MAJOR, EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRI. CHAMUNDESHWARI TEMPLE CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSURU-570 010. THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTIONS 10 AND 11 OF THE …ACCUSED - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:47088-DB CCC No. 1024 of 2022 CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION AGAINST THE RESPONDENT FOR HIS DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL FAILURE TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE ORDERS DATED 11.4.2022 AND 16.9.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND C RESPECTIVELY, PASSED IN WP NO.7704/2022 (S-RES) IN LETTER AND SPIRIT AND PUNISH HIM. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR) Sri H.L.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel complainant submits that since vide order dated 06.07.2023, the learned Single Judge has disposed of W.P.No.7704/2022, this contempt proceedings does not survive for consideration. A copy of the said order has been produced. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:47088-DB CCC No. 1024 of 2022

2.

Keeping in view the submission made by the learned counsel for the complainant, the contempt proceedings is hereby dropped. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, disposed of. Sd/- (K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Contempt Petition No. 1024 of 2022). ← Search more judgments