JANAHITA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(2)(1)
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. THE KARNATAKA STATE CO OPERATIVE APEX BANK REP BY ITS MANAGER NO.191 2ND STAGE WEST OF CHORD ROAD MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BENGALURU 560086 …RESPONDENTS IN DIN. THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 INDIA AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 24124 OF 2024 (T-IT) BETWEEN: JANAHITA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY (A CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED LENDING TO ITS MEMBERS) HAVING ITS BUSINESS AT NO.53 10TH CROSS 2ND MAIN WOC ROAD 2ND STAGE MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BANGALORE 560086 REP BY ITS SECRETARY K N RAMAMURTHY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/A NO.35/1 9TH MAIN 9TH CROSS PARAMILA NAGARA NANDINI LAYOUT BENGALURU 560096 (BY SRI. BALRAM R RAO.,ADVOCATE) AND:
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(2)(1) BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD …PETITIONER Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18802 WP No. 24124 of 2024 HC-KAR 6TH BLOCK NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560095
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BENGALURU-1 BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD 6TH BLOCK NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560095
THE KARNATAKA STATE CO OPERATIVE APEX BANK REP BY ITS MANAGER NO.191 2ND STAGE WEST OF CHORD ROAD MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BENGALURU 560086 …RESPONDENTS IN DIN. THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 INDIA AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED NOTICE U/S 226(3) OF THE ACT DTD. 27.04.2024 ITBA/COM/F/17/2024- 25/1064406408(1) (ANNX-E) FOR THE AY 2011-12; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS BY THEMSELVES BY THEIR SUBORDINATES, SERVANTS OR AGENTS TO WITHDRAW AND CANCEL THE IMPUGNED NOTICE U/S 226(3) OF THE ACT DTD. 27.04.2024 IN DIN.ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1064406408(1) (ANNX-E) FOR THE AY 2011-12; DIRECTION UNDER INDIA ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF PROHIBITING THE AND RESPONDENTS BY THEMSELVES THEIR SUB ORDINATES, SERVANTS AND AGENTS FROM TAKING ANY ACTION IN FURTHERANCE OR CONSEQUENT TO NOTICE U/S 226(3) OF THE ACT RESTRAINING - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:18802 WP No. 24124 of 2024 HC-KAR DTD. 27.04.2024 IN DIN. ITBA/COM/F/17/2024- 25/1064406408(1) (ANNX-E) FOR THE AY 2011-12 ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under: "The Advocate for the Petitioner prays that he may be permitted to the withdraw writ petition, since the grievance against which writ was filed, has been addressed and rectified by the Respondents. " In the light of the afore, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.