SRI. M.R. NAGENDRA v. SRI. R. VENUGOPAL
Case at a glance
- Bench
- V SRISHANANDA
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:50571
Outcome
Disposed of
The regular first appeal stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 96; O. XXIII r. 3
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Hence, the following: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:50571 RFA No. 275 of 2014 HC-KAR ORDER i. The regular first appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition; ii. The office is directed to draw a modify decree in terms of the compromise…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 275 OF 2014 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI. M.R. NAGENDRA AGED 63 YEARS SON OF LATE M.R. RAJANNA RESIDENT OF NO.22, 4TH A STREET K.R. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002 SINCE DEAD BY LRS. 1(a) SMT.NAGARATHNA.R AGED 61 YEARS WIFE OF LATE M.R.NAGENDRA 1(b) MS.SHREELAKSHMI M.N AGED 26 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE M.R.NAGENDRA 1(c) MS.RASHMI M.N AGED 24 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE M.R.NAGENDRA ALL ARE RESIDENT OF RESIDENT OF NO.22, 4TH A STREET K.R. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002 (BY SRI. N. JAGADISH BALIGA, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. R. VENUGOPAL S/O RAJARAM GUPTA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS M/S. VENUGOPAL SWAMY AND COMPANY BUTTER AND GHEE MERCHANT K.R. ROAD, OPP VANIVILAS HOSPITAL BANGALORE - 560 002 (BY SRI. JOSEPH ANTHONY, ADVOCATE) Page No.1 and 2 retyped and replaced vide court order dated 04.03.2026 …APPELLANTS …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:50571 RFA No. 275 of 2014 HC-KAR THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.1.2014 IN O.S.NO.5705/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE 24TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. PASSED THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT The legal representatives of the deceased appellant and the respondent are present.
The parties present a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC signed by the legal representatives of the deceased appellant, respondent and their respective counsel.
The contents of the compromise are read over to the parties and they admit that the terms of the compromise depict the true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out for the terms of the compromise.
As such, there is no impediment for this Court to place the compromise petition and dispose of the appeal.
Operative part
Hence, the following: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:50571 RFA No. 275 of 2014 HC-KAR ORDER i. The regular first appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition; ii. The office is directed to draw a modify decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The regular first appeal stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 96; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXIII r. 3.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.