(BY SRI. R V JAYAPRAKASH., ADVOCATE) v. CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The appeal stands disposed of in terms
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 100; O. XXIII r. 3
Judgment
R. UJJANAPPA S/O RUDRAPPA. SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS 1(A). S.R.SHAKUNTHALA W/O LATE R. UJJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 1(B). R.U. VIJAYAKUMAR S/O LATE R. UJJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 1(C). R.U. MARULASIDDESWARA S/O LATE R. UJJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 1(D). R.U. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE R. UJJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF DASIKATTE VILLAGE, RAMAGIRI HOBLI, HOLALKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577 526
(BY SRI. R V JAYAPRAKASH., ADVOCATE) …APPELLANTS - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:29666 RSA No. 1727 of 2010 AND:
1. REVANASIDDAPPA S/O LATE SIDDAPPA , SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS 1(A). PUTRAMMA W/O LATE REVANASIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD WORK 1(B). ANITHA D/O LATE REVANASIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS 1(C). RANJITHA D/O LATE REVANASIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS LRS (B) & (C) ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN PUTRAMMA, LR NO. (A) ALL ARE R/O DASIKATTE, RAMAGIRI HOBLI, RAMAGIRI POST, HOLALKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R. SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 (A TO C); R1(B AND C) MINORS REPRESENTED BY R1(A) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.03.2010 PASSED IN R.A.06/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FAST TRACK COURT, CHITRADURGA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT AND - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:29666 RSA No. 1727 of 2010 DECREE DATED 06.09.2007 PASSED IN O.S.81/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.), HOLALKERE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA JUDGMENT Parties present with their respective counsels.
A compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is filed.
The contents of the compromise petition is read over to the parties.
After understanding the contents, the parties have signed the compromise petition and also their respective advocates have also signed the compromise petition.
The parties further submit that there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out the terms of the compromise and it is voluntary. Therefore, there is no impediment for this court to accept the - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:29666 RSA No. 1727 of 2010 compromise petition and dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise.
A Demand Draft for a sum of Rs.2 Lakhs is furnished by the appellants to the respondents in the name of the respondent No.1 and the same acknowledged in the orders sheet. Hence the following:
Operative part
O R D E R (i) (ii) The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. The office is directed to modify the decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition as part of decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 17
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal stands disposed of in terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXIII r. 3.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.