The High Court
Case Details
- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6271 OF 2023 (MV-D) C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7528 OF 2023 (MV-D) IN MFA No.6271/2023: BETWEEN: BRANCH MANAGER RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED B.D.ROAD, NEAR PETROL BUNK CHITRADURGA-577 501 ALSO AT RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED NO.28, EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR CENTENARY BUILDING M.G.ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 NOW REPRESENTED BY MANAGER LEGAL (BY SRI ASHOK N.PATIL, ADVOCATE) …APPELLANT AND: 1. NARASIMHA NAIK S/O.GENANAIK AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 2. PARVATHI BAI W/O.NARASIMHANAIK AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 3. KAVERI N. D/O.NARASIMHANAIK AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 4. KAVYA N. D/O.NARASIMHANAIAK AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R-1 TO R-4 ARE R/AT LAMBANIHATTI CHANNAGANAHALLY VALSE VILLAGE THALUK HOBALI CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 522 5. T.VEERESHA S/O.THIPPESWAMY R/AT HOTTAPPANAHALLI CHALLAKERE TLAUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 522 …RESPONDENTS
Legal Reasoning
(BY SRI R.SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-4; R-5 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30.03.2023 PASSED IN MVC.NO.860/2020 BY II ADDITIONAL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT-V AT SENIOR CIVIL CHITRADURGA. IN MFA NO.7528/2023: BETWEEN: 1. NARASIMHA NAIK S/O.GENANAIK AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. PARVATHI BAI W/O.NARASIMHANAIK AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 3 KAVERI N. D/O.NARASIMHANAIK AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 4. KAVYA N. D/O.NARASIMHANAIK AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT LAMBANIHATTI CHANNAGANAHALLY VALSE VILLAGE THALK HOBLI CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 522 … APPELLANTS (BY SRI R.SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. T.VEERESHA S/O.THIPPESWAMY MAJOR OWNER OF AUTO BEARING NO.KA-16/B-3537 R/AT HOTTAPPANAHALLI CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 522 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER RELIANCE INSURANCE CO.LTD. B.D.ROAD, NEAR PETROL BUNK CHITRADURGA-577 501 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ASHOK N.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R-2; NOTICE TO R-1 IS DISPENSED V/O.DATED 04.03.2025) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30.03.2023 PASSED IN MVC.NO.860/2020 BY II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT-V AT CHITRADURGA. THESE APPEALS ARE COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT These appeals are preferred challenging the judgment and award dated 30.03.2023 passed in MVC.No.860/2020 by II Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT-V at Chitradurga (for short ‘the tribunal’). 2. The appeal preferred by the Insurance Company is seeking to set-aside the judgment and award passed by the tribunal on the ground that no opportunity was provided to the Insurance Company to lead evidence and the tribunal has passed an erroneous order taking into consideration the materials placed on record including the aspect of contributory negligence as against the deceased person, whereas the appeal preferred by the claimants is founded on the premise of inadequate and meager compensation awarded by the tribunal and consequently, enhance the compensation as the tribunal has not taken the correct and proper income for awarding compensation, so also, under other heads. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 3. Parties to the appeals shall be referred to as per their status before the tribunal. 4. Brief facts of the case is as under: On 30.12.2019, one Raghavendra was proceeding on a motor cycle bearing registration No.KA-16/EN-3919 from Sanikere to Challakere. When he came near Hottappanahally gate, an auto rickshaw bearing registration No.KA-16/B-3537 being driven by its driver came in a rash and negligent manner from opposite direction and dashed against the motor cycle of the said Raghavendra. Due to the said impact, the said Raghavendra fell down and sustained grievous injuries and while he was being shifted to the Hospital, he succumbed to the injuries. Hence, the claimants, who are the dependants and legal heirs of the deceased filed a claim petition seeking compensation against the owner of the auto rickshaw, the offending vehicle and the Insurance Company. - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 4.1 On appearance, respondent No.1 did not file written statement. However, respondent No.2-Insurance Company filed written statement denying the claim of the claimants, occurrence of accident, negligence on the part of the driver of the auto rickshaw, on the contrary, it is pleaded that the deceased himself contributed to the occurrence of accident and therefore, there is no liability on the part of the Insurance Company to pay the compensation. 4.2 On the basis of the materials placed on record, both oral and documentary, the tribunal has awarded total compensation of Rs.17,02,000/- with interest at 6% per annum and held that respondent Nos.1 and 2 are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation. However, since the policy was in force, respondent-Insurance Company was directed to pay the compensation within 30 days as per the apportionment made therein. 5. It is the vehement contention of Sri Ashok N.Patil, learned counsel for Insurance Company that the tribunal - 7 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 has committed a gross error in not taking into consideration the materials on record, both oral and documentary. Therefore, the judgment and award rendered by the tribunal is erroneous. He further contends that the tribunal has failed to appreciate the fact that the complaint has been lodged by one of the inmates of the auto rickshaw, who has implicated both driver of the auto rickshaw and rider of the motor cycle. It is contended that since there is equal contributory negligence of the rider of the motor cycle, the deceased in occurrence of the accident, the tribunal ought to have attributed the contributory negligence as against the rider of the motor cycle i.e. the deceased to certain extent, which has not been done in the present case. 5.1 It is further contended by learned counsel for Insurance Company that sufficient opportunity has not been given to the Insurance Company by the tribunal to lead evidence placing materials on record with regard to establishing the contributory negligence of the deceased, - 8 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 who was the rider of the motor cycle. It is also contended that the compensation amount awarded by the tribunal is exorbitant and the same requires to be countered by the Insurance Company by way of evidence. On these grounds, he contends that the judgment and award passed by the tribunal be set-aside and the matter be remanded back to the tribunal and sufficient and reasonable opportunity be provided to the Insurance Company to defend its case. 6. Per contra, Sri R.Shashidhara, learned counsel for claimants vehemently contends that the judgment and award passed by the tribunal is not sustainable, as the materials placed on record have not been appreciated by the tribunal and the income taken by the tribunal is on the lower side. He also contends that the absolute negligence is on the part of the driver of the auto rickshaw, who was suddenly come on the Highway without due caution. Therefore, the entire negligence has been rightly fastened on the driver of the auto rickshaw, consequently, the - 9 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 Insurance Company. On these grounds, he seeks to allow his appeal and enhancement of compensation. 7. I have heard learned counsel for Insurance Company and learned counsel for claimants. The occurrence of accident, involvement of vehicles, death having occurred due to the road traffic accident are proved and established by production of Exs.P1 to P10. The question now to be decided is what is the age, avocation, income, multiplier and the compensation to be awarded so also the issue of contributory negligence, if any, to be fastened on the deceased, who was riding the motor cycle on the unfortunate day as pleaded by the Insurance Company. 8. Apparently, it is seen from the order sheet of the tribunal that after completion of the evidence of the claimants' side, the respondents have not led any evidence, though he has filed an application on 06.12.2022 to reopen the case and to lead evidence of the respondents. - 10 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 9. On a careful perusal of the order sheet of the tribunal, it is seen that on 26.09.2022, PW.1 was fully cross-examined by the Insurance Company; thereafter, on 20.10.2022, the case was posted for the evidence of the respondents; subsequently, on 27.10.2022, 15.11.2022, 29.11.2022 and thereafter, on 06.12.2022; after granting sufficient time, when the matter was posted for arguments on 06.12.2022, the Insurance Company filed an application to recall the witness and reopen the case for adducing evidence of the respondents, which came to be allowed and the matter was posted on 19.12.2022 for the evidence of the respondents finally, on which day also, the respondents sought time; therefore, the matter was posted on 09.01.2023, on which day, Advocate of respondent No.2 prays time and since sufficient time was granted, the same was rejected and the matter was posted for arguments of Advocate for respondents finally on 16.02.2023; subsequently, on 16.02.2023, 27.02.2023, 01.03.2023 and 07.03.2023 and thereafter, on 30.03.2023, the judgment came to be passed. - 11 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 10. Under the circumstance, it is seen that sufficient time having been granted to the respondents to lead evidence and argue the matter, the same has not been utilised despite allowing the application filed by the Insurance Company by imposing cost of Rs.500/-. But the fact remains that according to the Insurance Company, FIR and chargesheet are also laid against the rider of the motor cycle, who was arraigned as accused No.2. Therefore, there is some materials on record, which have to be elaborated in his evidence. However, though sufficient opportunity has been given to the respondents, they have not adduced any evidence. Of course, the same can be compensated by imposing costs against the Insurance Company. 11. Since the Insurance Company is in appeal, the same would have to be considered favourably by providing opportunity to the Insurance Company to go before the tribunal by adducing evidence in a time bound manner and producing materials to elaborate its case. Therefore, this - 12 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 Court refrains from delving further into the merits of the matter as it may hamper the case of the claimants and the Insurance Company at this stage. 12. Under the circumstance, this Court is of the opinion that the matter requires to be remanded back to the tribunal to proceed with the same from the stage of evidence of the Insurance Company and for addressing arguments on the main matter in a time bound manner. Accordingly, I pass the following: i) ii)
Decision
ORDER The appeals are allowed; The judgment and award dated 30.03.2023 passed in MVC.No.860/2020 by II Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT-V at Chitradurga, is set- aside; iii) The matter is remanded back to the tribunal to the decide the same by providing an opportunity to the Insurance Company to adduce evidence and so also the claimants to cross-examine the respondents, if such evidence is adduced on - 13 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 granting such reasonable time and the parties be provided reasonable time to address their arguments; iv) The Insurance Company shall pay cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the claimants on the next date of hearing, which would be condition precedent; v) It is made clear that the tribunal shall proceed further from the stage of recording of evidence; vi) In case of any unnecessary adjournments, the tribunal is at liberty to impost exemplary costs on the parties; vii) The tribunal shall make an endeavour to dispose off the matter within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order; viii) The amount in deposit, if any, deposited before this Court, shall be transmitted to the jurisdictional tribunal forthwith; - 14 - NC: 2025:KHC:9364 MFA No. 6271 of 2023 C/W MFA No. 7528 of 2023 ix) Both parties shall appear before the jurisdictional tribunal on 25.03.2025, without awaiting any further notice from the tribunal or from this Court; x) The original records shall be transmitted to the jurisdictional tribunal forthwith; In view of disposal of the appeals, pending interlocutory application, if any, does not survive for consideration and the same pales into insignificance. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64