✦ Karnataka High Court

MR G MANJUNATHA v. BOOT BAZAR UNDERGROUND

CRL.P No. 10254 of 2022M KHAZI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Hence, petition is dismissed for default

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10254 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MR G MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O GURUSWAMY OLD ADDRESS: SRI VENKATESWARA TEXTILES, MILINA CLOTH CENTER (JAVALI MALIGE) NO:904, G.V. COMPLEX, B.H. ROAD, HDFC BANK AND BOOT BAZAR UNDERGROUND, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 562123. Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court Karnataka CURRENT ADDRESS: B1-101, JANAPRIYA APARTMENT, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE -562123. (BY SRI. K KISHAN DUTT., ADV.) AND: MR N RUDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH R/AT NO.34/02, PARAMANA LAYOUT, OPP: SBM BANK, B H ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 562123. …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:30725 CRL.P No. 10254 of 2022 HC-KAR THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN PRIVATE COMPLIANT PCR NO.270/2021 REGISTERED AS C.C.NO.9978/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA BENGALURU RURAL AGAINST THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner.

2.

No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session.

4.

This matter is of the year 2022. Vide order dated 24.07.2025, as a last chance, a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:30725 CRL.P No. 10254 of 2022 HC-KAR

5.

Despite the same, office objections have not been complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.

Operative part

6.

Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, petition is dismissed for default

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.P No. 10254 of 2022). ← Search more judgments