JASIR THANICHERI KANDY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

(BY SRI.GIREESHA J T, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BAGALURU P.S. REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT (BY SMT.RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/SEC.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH HE ORDER DATED 08.10.2021 AND

09.11.2021 PASSED BY THE XXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR NDPS CASES AT BENGALURU (CCH-33) IN CR.NO.68/2021 OF BAGALURU P.S AND ETC. ALBHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:49387 CRL.P No. 9595 of 2021 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation.

The petition is of the year 2021. The matter is listed for fourth time for compliance of office objections. Still, office objections have not been complied with.

The order sheet dated 29.10.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioners prays time. Petition is of the year 2021. It is listed for for compliance of office objections. Inspite of it, there is no progress in the matter. Learned counsel respondent opposes to grant any adjournment. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:49387 CRL.P No. 9595 of 2021 Finally, as a last chance, one week's time is granted for compliance of office objections. "

Inspite of the said order, there is no progress in the matter. It appears the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.

Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non prosecution. NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8 SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE