SRI.VISWAS P v. SMT.M.A.SAVITHA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdraw
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 125(1)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 50252 OF 2019 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI.VISWAS P., S/O LATE PADMANABHA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.102, 2ND MAIN, SHREYAS COLONY, J.P.NAGAR 7TH PHASE, BENGALURU -560 076 WORKING AT ERRICSON INDIAN PVT. LTD., AS TECHNICAL PRODUCT MANAGER LEVEL 7, 8 AND 9, CITRINE BLOCK, BEGMANE WORLD, TECHNOLOGY CENTER, OUTER RING ROAD, LAKSHMISAGAR LAYOUT, MAHADEVAPURA, BENGALURU -560 048 …PETITIONER Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. VENUGOPAL M.S., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT.M.A.SAVITHA W/O. VISWAS AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT NO.2/A, SY. NO.69, SRI. BAIRAVESHWARA NILAYA, KAIKONDARAHALLI, CARMELARAM OST SARJAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 035 THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER ON I.A. FILED U/S 125(1) OF CRPC DATED 07.09.2019 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. …RESPONDENT - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:23292 WP No. 50252 of 2019 PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU IN CRL. MISC NO.43/2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, WHEREBY INTERIM APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SEC.125(1) OF CRPC IS ALLOWED AND DISMISS THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE INTERIM RESPONDENT U/S 125(1) OF CRPC CLAIMING MAINTENANCE VIDE ANNEXURE-D. THE THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR “DISMISSAL”, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that writ petition is filed questioning the interim maintenance granted by the Court below and now, the matter is at the final stage and they will persue the pending matter before the court below. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdraw leaving it open to the petitioner to raise all the issues before the Court below. Pending I.A.s, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdraw
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 125(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.