SMT. P. ANUSUYA v. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 21690 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. P. ANUSUYA W/O RAMAKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.11, 6TH CROSS ROAD, ASEC MAIN ROAD, NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU - 560 032. …PETITIONER SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka (BY SRI. JAGADEESH D.C, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, FIRST FLOOR, K.R. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009.
THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER (GALI ANJANEYA DEVASTHANA) BBMP, SUB-DIVISION, FIRST FLOOOR, SWIMMINGPOOL BUILDING, 9TH CROSS, HAMPINAGARA BENGALURU - 560 104. (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. KARTHIKEYAN B.S, ADVOCATE FOR R2) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:700 WP No. 21690 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DTD 10.06.2025 BEARING VIDE ANNX-D1 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL AND NOT SUSTAINABLE UNDER LAW AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader is directed to take notice for respondent No.1. Sri.B.S.Karthikeyan has entered appearance for respondent No.2.
2. On the previous occasion, this Court had noticed the fact that the land in question is admittedly within the limits of the Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike, which is now the Greater Bengaluru Authority. The petitioner is seeking directions to the survey settlement authorities to survey the property in question. Nothing is said in the writ petition as to what is the reason for the petitioner to seek such directions to the survey settlement authorities or the revenue authorities. If there is any dispute between the petitioners or a counter claim - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:700 WP No. 21690 of 2025 HC-KAR made by some other person in respect of the land in question, then the remedy for the petitioner would be to approach a competent Civil Court. It is within the powers of the Civil Court to issue directions on an application to be made by the party to the revenue authorities or survey settlement authorities to furnish any information. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.