BANGALORE - 560 075 v. (BY SRI. U S YOGESH KUMAR.,ADVOCATE)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 57308 OF 2016 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. K GUNASAGAR, S/O LATE KANNAN, AGED 46 YEARS, DOOR NO.7, M.GANDHINAGAR, MUNNEKOLALU, MARATHAHALLI POST, BENGALURU - 560 037. (BY SRI. SANDHYA U PRABHU.,ADVOCATE) AND:
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER INDIAN BANK, KUPPAM BRANCH, T.B.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 075. …PETITIONER K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. U S YOGESH KUMAR.,ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF 43RD ACMM, MAYOHALL IN CRL.MISC.NO.50251/2016 VIDE ANNEX- F DTD.28.10.2016 PROCEEDING FURTHER REJECTING THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:31488 WP No. 57308 of 2016 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the proceedings under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act before the learned Magistrate has been dismissed for non prosecution. Therefore, the relief sought for in this petition does not survive for consideration.
Operative part
Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.