M/S K.M.AKBAR TRUST v. MR. GHANI HANEEF
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
- Constitution of India art. 215
Judgment
M/S K.M.AKBAR TRUST NO.94/3, INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE MS.NILOUFER AKBAR D/O LATE K.M.AKBAR MAJOR. (BY SRI. ABHINAV RAMANAND A - ADVOCATE) …COMPLAINANT AND:
MR. GHANI HANEEF AGED ABOPUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE ABDUL GHANI PROPRIETOR M/S C-3, COM.CEL.CITI NOW CHANGED AS "SNOW COLLECTIONS" GROUND FLOOR, NO.94/3-1 INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 AND ALSO AT:FF-1, 4TH FLOOR "TAJ REGENCY", NO.40 BENSON TOWN CROSS ROAD 2ND CROSS, BENSON TOWN BENGALURU-560046.
MR. RANJAN KUMAR BOHRA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS KANNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:34481-DB CCC No. 1967 of 2017 PROPRIETOR "M/S ACME SALES" GROUND FLOOR, NO.94/3-1 INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. AND ALSO AT:GROUND FLOOR "BLUE CROSS CHAMBERS" NO.14, INFANTRY ROAD CROSS BANGALORE-560001.
P.MOHAMMED SHANI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O P.MOHAMMED PROPRIETOR "M/S MILLENIUM POINT" GROUND FLOOR NO.94/3-1, INFANTRY ROAD BENGALURU-560001.
SRI KRISHNA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS PARTNER "M/S.FRIDGE HOUSE" NO.23, "ADITYA TOWERS" V.N.S.ROAD, TASKER TOWN SHIVAJI NAGAR BENGALURU-560 001.
SMT. GAYATRI DESAI W/O SRI GANAPATI DESAI PROPRIETRIX M/S.UNICORN RESTAURANT 1ST FLOOR & 3RD FLOOR NO.94/3-1, INFANTRY ROAD BENGALURU-560001.
SRI. AKMAL SHERIFF S/O LATE KHADER SHERIFF MAJOR, MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S CRESCENT INFORMATION AND MANAGING CENTRE, 2ND FLOOR NO.94/3-1, INFANTRY ROAD BENGALURU-560001. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:34481-DB CCC No. 1967 of 2017 AND ALSO SRI.AKMAL SHERIFF S/O LATE KHADER SHERIFF DIRECTOR NETWORK HOMES (P) LTD NO.619, 2ND MAIN ROAD 1ST STAGE, INDIRANAGAR BENGALURU-560038. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. M J ALVA - ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED NO.1 AND 4; SRI. SHIVASWAMY – ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED NO.2; SRI. M C RAVIKUMAR – ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED NO.3; SRI. G K BHAT – SR. ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SUDHA D ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED NO.5; SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR – ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A MADHUSHUDHAN RAO–ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED-6) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AND R/W ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCE COMMITTED BY THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL, DELIBERATE AND DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 22/03/2017 PASSED IN W.P.NO.41069/2014 AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR ARGUMENTS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR) Learned counsel Sri Abhinav Ramanand A for the complainant is present before the Court physically. - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:34481-DB CCC No. 1967 of 2017
2. Learned counsel Sri M.J.Alva for Accused Nos.1 and 4 is present before the Court physically inclusive of learned counsel Sri G.K.Bhat for Accused No.5.
3. Learned counsel Sri Naveen is present before the Court physically and represents Sri A.Madhusudhana Rao for Accused No.6.
4. However, learned counsel for the complainant has filed a memo seeking to dispose the present contempt proceedings. The memo is taken on record. In terms of the memo, the present contempt proceedings is closed. Sd/- (K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE DKB
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.