ADARSH v. STATE BY JAYANAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Inspite of that, there is non-compliance of office objections nor there is any representation. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29 Sd/-…
Judgment
(BY SRI K. SREEDHAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
#2. STATE BY JAYANAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, REP. BY CIRCLE INSPECTOR, JAYANAGAR - 560 011. PAVAN KUMAR N.N., S/O NAGESH N.F., AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 71 RAMANILAYA, 2ND MAIN, SHREYAS COLONY, J.P NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, BANGALORE - 78. (BY SMT. ASMA KOUSER, ADDL. SPP) …PETITIONERS …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:34340 CRL.P No. 8953 of 2021 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.169/2021 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE STATION, BANGALORE DATED THE PETITIONERS FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S 409,420,418,120B R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.21 OF BUDS ORDNANCE.
09.08.2021 AGAINST THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No representation.
#2. The order sheet dated 20.06.2024 reads as under: "Two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition shall stand dismissed."
#3. Inspite of that, there is non-compliance of office objections nor there is any representation. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29 Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.