SMT. ASHALATHA v. SMT. KAVITHA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- TARA VITASTA GANJU
- Neutral citation
- 2026:KHC:2731
Outcome
Withdrawn
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO.20650 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. ASHALATHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
2. SMT. SHOBHA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
3. SMT. SULOCHANA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
4. MISS. JYOTHI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
5. MISS. CHITRA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
6. SRI. RAVINDRA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, PETITIONERS 1 TO 6 ARE THE CHILDREN OF LATE CHEENKRA MOILY, ALL ARE RESIDING AT DOOR NO.1/139, SHRINIDHI, HOSAMANE, KALLOTTE ROAD, PERVAJE, KARKALA KASBA VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK – 574 104, UDUPI DISTRICT. (BY SRI. VEERSH M UPPIN., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:2731 WP No. 20650 of 2021 HC-KAR AND:
SMT. KAVITHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
SMT. GEETHA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT ‘SHIVA KRIPA NILAYA’ PERVAJE, KARKALA TOWN, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT – 574 104
SMT. GOWRI, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, W/O LATE YELLAPPA DEVADIGA,
SRI. GANESH DEVADIGA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
SMT. KAVITHA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
SMT. SAVITHA, AGED ABOUT 34 YERAS, RESPONDENT NOS.4 TO 6 ARE THE CHILDREN OF LATE YELLAPPA DEVADIGA, RESPONDENTS 3 TO 6 ARE RESIDING NEAR MAHALINGESHWARA TEMPLE, PERVAJE, KARKALA TOWN, KARKALA TALUK – 574 104, UDUPI DISTRICT.
SMT. GANGA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, D/O LATE POOVAKKU MOILTHY, RESIDING AT BAILUMANE, KALLOTTE ROAD, - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:2731 WP No. 20650 of 2021 HC-KAR KARKALA KASBA VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT – 574 104.
SRI. HARISH MOILY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O LATE SANJEEVI MOILTHI, RESIDING AT ‘SHIVA KRIPA NILAYA’, PERVAJE, KARKALA TOWN, KARKALA TALUK – 574 104, UDUPI DISTRICT. (R1 TO R8 ARE SERVED) …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19.08.2021 PASSED IN MISC. CASE.NO.13/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, UDUPI DISTRICT, THE MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO.13/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI AND ETC. ANNEXURE-A REJECT UDUPI AND THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
Operative part
3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:2731 WP No. 20650 of 2021 HC-KAR
4. All pending applications stand closed. VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.