KARNATAKA v. (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ GODACHI, AGA FOR R1)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
1. SRI. SURESH .B.R S/O SRI. B.N RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
2. SMT. SHANTHALA SURESH W/O SRI. B.R SURESH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.6, "SAI RAM" LAKSHMI LAYOUT, BEHIND MAHA LAKSHMI TEMPLE PIPE LINE ROAD ABBIGERE, CHIKKABANAVARA POST BENGALURU-560 090. HARIKRISHNA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONERS (BY SMT.SHYLAJA S.V, ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001. - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:32872-DB WP No. 20321 of 2024
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST, BENGALURU-560 020
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR. SHIVARAM KARANTH LAYOUT WITH LIMITS OF SOMASHETTIHALLI YESHAVANTHAPUR HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BANGALORE NORTH-560 064 (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ GODACHI, AGA FOR R1) …RESPONDENTS THE RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE REPRESENTATION DTD 18.05.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D AND DISPOSE OF THE SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AFTER NOTICE TO THE PETITIONER AND TILL THEN NOT TO DEMOLISH ANY PORTION OF THEIR BUILDING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE HEREIN AND ETC. CONSIDER TO THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO) Learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn our attention to memo for withdrawal dated 01.08.2024, which reads as under: - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:32872-DB WP No. 20321 of 2024 "The petitioner above named submits as follows: Since there are few major mistakes in the writ petition the petitioner seeks leave of this Hon'ble court to withdraw the above writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above writ petition as withdrawn, with liberty to file fresh writ petition in the interest of justice. "
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners reiterates the prayer for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Operative part
3. Noting the averments in the memo for withdrawal, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition in accordance with law. Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.