✦ Karnataka High Court

AMEER JAN v. THRILOKCHANDRA

L NARAYANASWAMY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

objections, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. ABDUL JABBAR S/O MOHAMMED SAB AGED 82 YEARS, R/O J.K. PURAM VILLAGE, RAJPET ROAD, KYASAMBALLI HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK- 563114. ... RESPONDENT(S) RSA FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.02.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.117/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL…

Judgment

(By Sri. IQBAL PATEL, ADVOCATE) AND

1.

THRILOKCHANDRA S/O LATE SUGUNANANTHAIAH AGE: MAJOR, 40 YEARS, R/O J K PURAM VILLAGE, RAJPET ROAD, KYASAMBALLI HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK-563114

2.

GULZAR BEGUM W/O IQBAL PASHA ..2.. 2 RSA No.1035/2011 AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O J.K. PURAM VILLAGE, RAJPET ROAD, KYASAMBALLI HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK-563114.

Operative part

3.

ABDUL JABBAR S/O MOHAMMED SAB AGED 82 YEARS, R/O J.K. PURAM VILLAGE, RAJPET ROAD, KYASAMBALLI HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK- 563114. ... RESPONDENT(S) RSA FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.02.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.117/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC,K.G.F., DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 08.10.2007 PASSED IN O.S.NO.40/05 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.),K.G.F. This RSA is coming on for orders, this day the court made the following ..3.. 3 RSA No.1035/2011 ORDER Two weeks time granted for compliance of office objections, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the bench. Ty. By : S.B.A R. By: VK C. By : DPS Ty. Date : 16-12-14. C. Date: 22-1-15 Sd/- JUDGE Copy Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: objections, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments