SRI. SHARATH RAJ P. A v. PARVEEN
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. In case petitioner fails to pay the amount as agreed upon, liberty is granted to the respondent to file an HC-KAR - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:42035 RPFC No. 158 of 2026 CNR: KAHC010414592026 execution petition for execution of the impugned order i.e., the order…
Judgment
SRI. SHARATH RAJ P. A. AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O LATE ASHOK P T, # SOUGHANDA, NO. 918, SAHUKAR, CHENNAIAH ROAD, T. K LAYOUT, MYSURU-570009. (BY SRI. SAGAR A SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA SMT. ARCHANA N. R. AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, D/O RANGASWAMY, W/O. SHARATH RAJ P.A., RESIDING AT NO.39, WARD NUMBER 08 MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, MYSORE ROAD, CHANNARAYAPATNA, HASSAN. CURRENTLY RESIDING AT: NO 78/7, 3RD CROSS, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU - 570012. (BY SRI. SATHVIK M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. LOKESHA D. K., ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07.03.2026 PASSED …RESPONDENT HC-KAR - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:42035 RPFC No. 158 of 2026 CNR: KAHC010414592026 IN CRL.MISC.NO.805/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.144 OF BNSS ACT FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER Petitioner Sri. Sharath Raj.P.A and respondent Smt. Archana.N.R are present in person.
Vakalath filed by Sri. Sathvik.M who represents the respondent is accepted.
Sri. Sagar.A.Shetty, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri. Sathvik.M, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the parties to the proceedings intend settle disputes amicably. Petitioner/husband agreed to pay respondent/wife a sum of Rs.12,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of all maintenance claims, arrears and liabilities and respondent HC-KAR - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:42035 RPFC No. 158 of 2026 CNR: KAHC010414592026 agreed to receive the same. Learned counsel submits that both the parties are filing application to record their compromise and to close the proceedings.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondent agreed to receive Rs.12,00,000/- towards permanent alimony and therefore, as per the terms of compromise, the proceedings in this revision petition may be closed.
Joint affidavit given by both the parties is gone through. Having considered the contents of the affidavit, this Court considers desirable to close the proceedings as sought for.
Therefore, proceedings in this revision petition are closed.
The affidavit filed shall form part of record.
In case petitioner fails to pay the amount as agreed upon, liberty is granted to the respondent to file an HC-KAR - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:42035 RPFC No. 158 of 2026 CNR: KAHC010414592026 execution petition for execution of the impugned order i.e., the order rendered by the Court of First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Mysuru Crl. Misc. No.805/2024 dated 07.03.2026. The revision petition is accordingly disposed on. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE NS CT:TSM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 144.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 07 Mar 2026. The bench was CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.