✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI P KRISHNASWAMY v. SHIVAPRAKASH

RFA No. 1751 of 2013V SRISHANANDA

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. SMT. RUKMINI AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, D/O LATE P. SHANTHAMMA, RESIDING AT 137/3, LAKSHMAIAH BLOCK, 12TH CROSS, BEHIND SBI, H.A. FARM POST, GANGANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 032 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JWALA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2 SRI. H.T. VASANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1751 OF 2013 (DEC) BETWEEN: SRI P KRISHNASWAMY SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, SMT. AMRUTHA, W/O LATE P. KRISHNASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT 3/7, 5TH TEMPLE STREET, SIDDANTHI LAYOUT, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560 003 (BY SRI. M. ASWATHNARAYANA REDDY, ADVOCATE) …APPELLANT AND:

1.

SHIVAPRAKASH HINDU, MAJOR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

2.

SRI MANJUNATH HINDU, MAJOR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:49969 RFA No. 1751 of 2013 HC-KAR BOTH ARE SONS OF LATE B.L. RAJANNA, RESIDING IN A PORTION OF HOUSE BEARING NO.3/6, 5TH TEMPLE STREET, SIDDARTHI BLOCK, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560 003

3.

SMT. RUKMINI AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, D/O LATE P. SHANTHAMMA, RESIDING AT 137/3, LAKSHMAIAH BLOCK, 12TH CROSS, BEHIND SBI, H.A. FARM POST, GANGANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 032 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JWALA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2 SRI. H.T. VASANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.08.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.7559/1999 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:49969 RFA No. 1751 of 2013 HC-KAR ORAL JUDGMENT Sri M. Aswathanarayana Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the sole appellant is no more and despite best efforts, he could not get the particulars of the legal representatives of the deceased appellant. Placing the submission on record, the appeal stands dismissed as abated by operation of law. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HDK CT-SG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RFA No. 1751 of 2013). ← Search more judgments