The Divisional Controller v. Sri. Manjunatha Rao
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows : “The WP filed against the award in I.D. No.26/2020 Dated 28.02.2023 on the…
- Para 33. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo modifying the Award dated 28.02.2023 passed by the II Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru in I.D. No.26/2020 vide Annexure ‘E’. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv* 4 FILED BEFORE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT…
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA & SRI. P.D. SUBRAMANYA, MEMBER W.P.No.17330/2023 (LK) (Lok Adalath No. 153/2024) BETWEEN: The Divisional Controller, B.M.T.C., South Region, Central Office, K.H. Road, Bangalore-560 027, Herein represented by The Chief Law Officer, B.M.T.C., Central Offices, K.H. Road, Shanthi Nagar, Bangalore - 560 027. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE) AND: Sri. Manjunatha Rao S/o Srinivasa Rao, Aged about 50 years, R/o Santhekodihalli, Achar Street, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District-562 117. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. L. SHEKAR, ADVOCATE ) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE AWARD DATED 28.02.2023 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE IN I.D. NO. 26/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE ‘E’. THE PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the Award dated
28.02.2023 passed by the II Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru in I.D. No.26/2020 vide Annexure ‘E’.
#2. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows : “The WP filed against the award in I.D. No.26/2020 Dated 28.02.2023 on the file of the II Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under: The petitioner – Corporation to reinstate the workman into service with continuity of service and consequential benefits for the purpose of terminal benefits and withholding of three annual increments with cumulative effect and without backwages”. 3
#3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo modifying the Award dated 28.02.2023 passed by the II Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru in I.D. No.26/2020 vide Annexure ‘E’. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv* 4 FILED BEFORE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT WP. NO. 17330/2023 (LOK ADALATH NO. 153/2024) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, BMTC. ... Petitioner AND: SRI. MANJUNATHA RAO ... Respondent JOINT MEMO The WP filed against the award in ID No.26/2020 Dated 28.02.2023 on the file of the II Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under: The petitioner – Corporation to reinstate the workman into service with continuity of service and consequential benefits for the purpose of terminal benefits and withholding of three annual increments with cumulative effect and without back wages. The parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 19/01/2024 at Bengaluru Bench. SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER SIGNATURE OF RESPONDENT Sd/- ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER ADVOCATE FOR REPONDENT Sd/- Sd/-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.