(BvSri .. MR. Sadashiva Reddv Ad t’oeatat v. T* CIt

Judgment

1. 1 Thvamagc.ndhi HobIi4 Neiaruauaala )NnL Sru[L4unitlivarnrn!. XJn I :st- • ‘ t*% Rio:un.t&rzaoauavara. Yeswanthapura Fiobil, •Rauaalore Noriti. •1a.luic ae•!1 nrLRSbohava[F. ti,ntn’ 5[ ‘A- *t4 5) 6) tHni’ N )-ii%fl, 0 L’ ‘J T Poilee (iiuatteins Jogupaiva, Ulsoor. t F 1 H Vt5Lt!llO]5fl I S./o, Late Veurcatappa. Aged 75 years, Rio. Alur Villaae. Bs.navadi Post. .Magadi TUck. Banalore Rural District. 8) 8trLGancaturna. ‘A6o. FUFianuuEtaurliara’,appa Ag.ed a..bout 60 .years R a Kautaaiaanapa’ta •Katuhtbanabadi Post vuia,t Nnbli I mt DFL(r T* ri ‘‘flfl,I I T1 1 II 144 5’! 411 IF,A - PH ir S ‘- - 4 sJHLat “I F%tA N s. tat tra.ppa. Roddo, -rovtieate for irespontic•ri I NO Al) So r ci1ra4est U 0 1 picooord Is poaoo 1 Sri,lS4.]N4,iv1adlu..tsu-dhsi..Ad.voesl[e 0...n 1555 :)!]deo•. fl:l3./ H A S

4., 4 This Regular First Appeal is filed under Order XLI Rule I read with Section 96 ofCivil Procedure Code, 1908, against the Judgement and decree daled.19-8-2000 passed in O.S.No.5930:90 by the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge. Bangalore dismissing the suit for partiGon separate possession mesne profits and for costs and etc., RFA CROSS OBJECTION NO.22001 IN RFA No.9721200Q BETWEEN:

1. SiniShamdamma, W/o. Narasimhniah, Age Major, Rfo.Chikfrabanavara Yeswanthapura Ilobli, Bangalore North Taluk.

2. Situ. Annnayyamtna, WO. Krishnappa, Major, Rio Gubbalal Village, Subraniamanyapura Post, Varthur HoWl, Banglaore South Taluk.

3. Smt.Ganganuna W/o. Naravanappa, Major, R/o.Chikkabanavara Yeswanthapura Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk.

4. Smils4hmarnnm, £5 :4/ 1E4 um.ai.iiaiah. n 1 :1 l rI Inauastg.naiw. V !I1LI2C I)obbabele Pest Thyamaaondhi iiebIi •VJttInl’rt .1 CllSI&i&I4il I 1:11. nln rr1ini iflLJvtUiItLfly’VrHIflLL W!o. Late Krishnappa., Major.. I %)I ‘tLIItIIaLJtIt&l ISI’Il;s. Ranaon Ncuh1.i Tat.ik . CM )SSC)R.IPCrCRS

(BvSri .. MR. Sadashiva Reddv Ad t’oeatat ‘ I. SriPCNarasimaha. Martha. S/c, V,Raniaiah, A K: Cl W I f/ti, I at S/ace. Cl Cll £ LU JJ S-I 0’,S, \i.fl,, I ndiilzflr,d, nie1 f’n4u Baugc1oie4 ‘e V. Cl ‘m!K,!(’flfli’V5 T* CIt I I Il *Ij, %,.ILit!L14,.iItII-I4Cl, (VCII%4fl ti2ClVILtj(’L R/o. 40 RIceR Police Quarters, Jogupalya, Ulsoor Bangaicre PPSPUNTWNTS RFA Cross Objections are filed Ubder Order XLI P:..ule .22 , ot the Coda C Cml Pr odare 1998 a.nst the on renL at.nI Deeree• ciaten 1. 00200 nassed di 0. S On. 5938/20 on thti tile 1- SY* -‘- - . In n fflA-I — ‘-I4Ii 11 ‘ This Reuslar First Appeal and IdE/A.. Crosstil ieciions a fin the Court delivered the aa’ ing been iwase and restr nO n 22 dO” 9 and oc’mna pronounicemen I of judgment following a this dan, ii’ 1 an 0 : ! Ills IS 4T) fls-S4I I n.siiii I Im€---i, . I Ins! Inc panes are jelerrel to di die” tank bejare ii e seal court ICr the sake of e•onvenience, e *1 .5 1 he I !.*ITfl1I V fli ‘nGIIfl!.ITalslIll,rlis -ifl fkifl5flI’ I [0 a .5 are ole on ago te•rs 01 [VI a invappa ann n.angamnia ann: IlItl 5-1I , 1 were the on lv legal heirs en tilled to succeed to the cs-tate- of their parents. Gauganarasainma was the eldest daughter. She was I — I I .5 — I I — I- I * %a<da CE5- aaiLai zc-s2-c\t He hckCb tflL fflSiflUJJ... RcavainnJrna 4 SUe 515 stst.ei 1U.)ae5 a .W UlflVaflUS. - •STW. (gjia had a se i ci 1t 111’ e s I1CItLLLSIILPP J d1 i .I.hinurnaiah He is said Lu h.as:e died issueiess slier his .m.arriage i,th tnclreniuj 1 ia’ined tn ii he hersaTiuttI o’ itt d!d E Zitiis:n ci t I i T4 tiC flI fl7l[1I I 4- I I tnt Ct I c St%nIU at1icwe vci. t. tb dQ Lsa-_t I - -. ‘i Rnga’nnia cc prepe’ 11ts uecribed a’ flUUK Z [0 1 C p a”” arc ‘ed ‘o be JIl ‘he a me ci Me’u’ appa the nternaI araud ,, I ‘a ; It ap 5fl5 ‘lit it ‘1 1 hieae’e_it ‘ç, 1-i tr ilj I 5 t\ il’- — 1 CI I ‘ I_ 4 I - _ — IflIflJ5lC SitU 5[t )0.j Li C Ji U C U L 1” 15 tauh[aUl1a alto 1ftQ Inlesla, lfl lfl ti’ i ‘Ps. IL Is tIal”Ic S ‘flat Icatiieil H ‘s.. a t Itt ass iakiug ttrt he phin1ti I aid 1 s sistel and sac sad periritlissi. i.hem Lu eniov i.he usuirneis of the lands. 1,1 is die S 8 cs.flfllJi:ainL ‘ (b.c ptai.uu.ti. Oral. ari.er mc derild. .it.afl fl!lflS.., i.rc deftindants are preventing (he plaintiff from e•niering upon the 5uit t’ p1ies arm t”ovwu e ‘isulrm “ti ‘Pc m ‘i. I’ m I ‘t’tCC ‘C I T’ ‘ ‘“C C’ S S ULI’llds anu inure are a’ cing cm is m trees ‘ mt. p’anieo hr Rangarom n and ere read’, Sn (‘arrest at (he owe “1 hang oi the• sell.. In ;iern nom o.f ((or .4’ Schedule. P..anizsunms.. had c S C’ c me A I ‘m u 5”ee 5 t e’ 1 or 4 P respcce’ Iv sor ‘i’ rein tarn v’e’nhms ‘a oil ‘‘ r5ç 5) the Schedule properties ssar1nu mops are e’° so I’ w ire c r,s ,nw , r’,isrc g \ I vu s , S (‘i •, vA p o‘tcmandeu par noon’ The de.ttindants having refbse..d and seeki.ng t.o alieoa.te the I’ rC A I s’u. I ‘ S 2 I tsrr t-rj; t 5 mm ‘ Delcrm’ nits n” 1 ‘ 3 res’s’m be s’nt u nte’rwna ‘ ‘aS we po” tr1Ps ‘n e’ was” “ one on tim daughtew nf’ 34,jn, A ‘pa ‘nd I 1 tuLt1 n a “ Cc a’ a 3, ,b I Lj behind (he plaintiff and his sisier It was claimed that Mannuippa and. Rancpa.nnm. mid univ live daughters. naraciv, the deldndarits. ,3•• .. aiii tJT C , .2 L c %t%4 f- , 1 fl’ 11 I I nqcrcarw [Jfi% IWfl I fl15 fr flA fl I flfl I’I’ 4flp I al_ S 1ess Schedule B prupe’ ‘us “crc i ic properties ff dccc “cc lain’ is appa Is’ ‘n’ appa cue H mci” so oars ppe ‘sre the Prnhpr r,,n,, fiflI A{I LI I LI I III It rlan”mandu ‘ra’ appa h17 n5% ‘rh A Pt’ H ‘u!flctrl’rw dppd’c ccatn tns mower nancamnia aucceeded Lu the pn’peracs wangann.na had executed a registered trill da..tcd 27 3.1. P84 reqt’eafn’ns “eInc’i ci r”’r’ c- 1 ii, I flft ti i n I rI rt -rI, ‘. ‘ I _c ‘ I — tic dclhridrmts. They arc in possession a.ad enjovm ent of :..fc. same. 3 c c . c c - C - - c c B P c c c c a — I c c l l E E B P — — c — c a — ‘ - 4 - 7 ; B c c - c c c c a ‘ a c c c a c c c c I l c c E c 4 c . p - p B P c — c & . c c ’ a ’ - 4 - c c c c c c c B P - 4 , _ ; c c c — c c . c c c C c c a c : c c a c c c c c c — p p c c 4 ’ 4 - c 4 c c E E 4 a a 4c . p - c c c , a — c c ” 7 a c c l E - - a - B P - F — - - — c . c c - 6 — c c . - — - c ’ i c , “ - c — c c — c c c c — c c i - c c ø c c c “ — a C a c p c c c c c — c c B — P — B P — . ’ 4 4 c c c c _ , p — c c c c c c 4 & a c c c c c c c c l E ; B c c — a — c c c — c 7 4 — c c — . a B L ’ - a 4 - c c - 4 — - — c ‘ . c c — c c - B P l E - a c c c c c c c c c c - - 4 c c , - a i c c c c — . 4 . ’ 4 c a . t i c — c c - — c c c c - C a c c — — y c , , : c c . . . c c C c — c a l E a : a c c I t - r — c . c c - a c c a - 6 - . r f B L - c c ? — $ - 4 c c l E > c — c 4 c 4 c 4 - 4 . c c i c — a . . . . p c c c c c c a p p a c c E C . . 4 c c — — c c $ c c c c c c c c c c c c c , _ t P c c . c c a L : c c - c c — c - c ; B . — . p p , . , 4 ‘ — — c c c c - — c c a — a — a t i p a - c c L l E c c - - 4 - a c c i c . 7 p p . 4 4 — c c a - a - c c a ‘ p . p - E B c c - c c c c - a t t c c . l E c c c c c — c B P a _ F c c c c c I c c a c c 4 — 4 c c a ’ l f B P . a — p p - a c c c c c c a % t ; B B P c c c c ‘ - c - , - c c c — c c B P — - — & c c ” 4 - 4 c c — c c . , c c a c c 6 . . 4 c c “ c c c c - , - B P I ( . c c • c c c c c — - F c c — a c c i “ c c - ” I — c “ ‘ c 4 — p — 4 4 4 4 c c a c c c c a c c . — i c c c c c a c c a c c p c c B P . c c a . c — c c c L c c c c c - — c c c c — . p c c — P — P c c . — — - . c P ‘ - . . . L a c c c c ’ . . p — c c c c c c — B 4 P c - . , p - a a L 1 c c c c c c c c c c c C c c p p c c - c c B P c c . F c c a t i c c c c c I - a B P - • - c c c c c c a r P a c P U c c a l f - c c - c c c c c P 4 c c c c — c ‘ c has admitted all the other avenneots in [tie plaint and elainis that she is enti:tled to a: share alonpwith ide plaintiff (III IflI— ifl fl4nIfliflU( Iflt-’ h’ii: E’iflfl ‘IcI ‘,e hflV(fl-fl tie plaintiff to prove that his’ molder Ganganarasarnnra was ‘deed n ttdL’ ltj3 n I nT - r n g a p el the su’t propeitics fire trial coon eas1 the ourden an we defendtints fri. prove t.hal Ranl•nnn!na ha.d e.x.ccoted a retnst.crao wil.i I “(“1 1 I!’.14 ,, ‘ . I’ U). r I ‘ I 1*-.’.lU)’ . 1’ U) n I ., 11 ‘ I properties an•d hirther, whether she had also execu i.ed a will dated

148. 1990 in respect of A Schedule property 51w trial court east. I . ‘ ‘I U) I U I . , I I (U - i’ hatS executed a furt,her will dated 5,9.1990, aller cancelling, will dated 14.8. 1 IshO, and whether, she was entitled to a onwsixth Sjct tat h r the plaintiff had proved I hat he was ide son 01 Gangimaraxainma. The try.d court has also held that deltindants I to 5 had proved the p A a a D A i g r g A : 4 - a — - a a a p a A C - — - A L E — a “ a Z . . . a a - a . ? 9 a - 3 4 9 4 : 9 — — , i f a a 4 : p a a a a - : 4 a — - a a 4 4 : 4 4 9 9 - > - A A - — a a ! s — a - — — a L r a a - a : 4 : 4 - - : 4 £ a , - - a — - a - - a - - a — . - a C ’ r r i L — A r c D A a C A a — > - a . . s _ 4 a — : 9 A — t a : ) - a 4 9 4 - — a - a a 4 9 • - a — a a - : F ‘ — — 4 a 3 4 1 : F — - — • , . • a — a : a — - a - a a a a 4 9 a C — p : ) - a . : 9 9 4 : ) - a ) 4 ( — - a r - 4 : a 9 : — 9 a : a 4 4 . 4 3 A . - a P a A a — j a . a D i a C : 9 a - , a - A C a : F a : F A C - : F - . , 4 . - a a : 4 a - a a : - - 4 ) - 4 — a . d - 4 l f P i L — a ‘ . — - A a — 4 3 9 4 9 a l A : a a ? 9 a . . - a — a a - a : F a a - a - C A a 4 3 — - , - _ - a — a : 4 9 C - a A — a A a — a — - a - a : 4 a — a — a a a : 4 — F 4 - a - p - a a a a a a c - a - a - a a - a ? 9 a - a ‘ 4 - a - . a a a D A • D A : 4 : a a C 4 3 a — a 3 — a — - A a a a — a ’ E f f f f — a — A 4 9 C a a - a a - — - — a a , - p A 4 A4 - - a - a A : F s a . A 4 U . . a ! L E - A . 9 — a : F : a 4 3 - a a L E a a C : F - a a — — a - : 4 — - a a r ; a c a T - A C a a L — a E : 4 : — a - a - a - a F : a — a — - r : 4 a a a p P a - & A a - a “ : F - a 9 f f - a a a a a — — - , — a - L E a - a - a a — a r : F a - a p p A — - a a - a ’ ; a r 3 a a A : - a - - a a a i A L a a a — 4 a : 9 a - a I r c . p 3 f f L — — a r — a a C - 4 : 4 a r 4 : F a - : 4 a a a — - a • ) a — a D A — = S L C 5 . . - a . a 4 4 2 2 4 3 3 a a - . 4 . V a . a C L C ’ r ’ a C — 5 — 4 V a . . : B 7 3 3 , — V C . a a a 5 L C a 5 3 3 L C - : L C : . 5 3 3 - a 5 a 5 s a 5 . B L C — ( . 5 C — . 3 3 - 5 . 7 . a _ a a . a — a — ‘ . a V a . ‘ a - a C — ? 5 - a . — ‘ a V - — a C - C a . a a a ? 5 • a a i C a V a - . a — a C 2 . 5 3 3 q — L C C . . . 7 ( a . . a C . . . — . a — — a : C : V — 4 L C 2 ( . V 4 . . a r s . . . 2 a : 5 2 — ? 5 4 — . a - r ? 5 a a a a C a a C . — a — . a a 7 . a , L C — S a L C . a . . : : . a a 2 ( 2 . C C — . a — a B 5 . a a — t , r a ; 4 . ? 5 . . a . B “ a 2 . a L C r a . 4 4 t C E F 4 4 5 . a a a V - B . . - a a . C . a . a — C B — 4 4 V L C : B — — — - a — - — V - 4 . C C V E F a a L C 5 4 , 4 . C ’ e S a — . a L C L C a a ‘ - V a — a S - — V C C a ? 5 a — . a . r : a - — C ‘ a r 4r 1 4 . B L C a ‘ ‘ $ V 4 V . . 5 a . C L C - . a a V . a a E F a a C - C — a 5 2 . ? 5 ? 5 a . 4 . . . — . a a — a 3 a L C B . L C — — 4 a : 5 ? 5 — a 4 . E F a B a 4 4 L C a - a 3 3 C , — 7 ( a : B a L C C - 4 5 5 V - a ’ V — 4 : - — t ( - ? 5 . a a • — 5 r C - — - _ r a 4 — . 4 . . C a 4 4 3 3 : B . a : a : B . a 4 . 5 r 5 a • - . 5 — 5 r ? 5 — . a : 4 - — C — : B C - a . a — — ’ 4 4 S C ? 5 — 2 . 4 a 4 . a 2 . a ? 5 V a ? 5 . a — 4 C ( V C - a 4 5 _ 3 * ‘ - . V a f L C L C a a — a — S — 5 ? 5 S ‘ - 5 C a L C — . 7 L C f . 2 - — r C 5 L C 4 . . 4 a - C - a a 5 - a 3 3 a 3 3 4 . 4 . - — 4 4 . a ‘ . — a — a 4 . 4 — 4 - a : C — - ? 5 4 — - a the deee.ased son oi Ranganma.. tianemari tianiyappa has ais.o been ve jowl tooer lee W115 I1 LI I I I ‘ ‘C Ike ‘%J I know toe other attesone itnc,’ s I he ‘“eofl swan’ 3’ t re-rnn nkn IrLI LIII ihp 41fl h1-ns LIfl I nLIifI-nrIIT I I 4LiYI.I- I LIItIIfl LI: i-Ill h II III an old man, are glarinii instanees of fdrther suspicion. It is only III 1%IItItiI Il— iiIIIItIIIfl 9%Lt LIflIILALII iCe Iteer, c—— en LILJI I::; %k.II I /:fl / /1 1 reuistered will anil the sell I dated 14 I LI( said to have. es:eeote,d P,n,n,rnnIe Ill rLI’2flP1 I ‘I S i 1 5%.ICILII I I flil It T11LIr h;in liii r:11 I jI I *li LI I lull I ¶j% Te [315 ‘s alse to be seen tha’ in the firs nstanee delendants no to 5 d’d nu, ret’ r an’ n’ Pc 9 nae’ma nnir e 1 n. I%\ an r I I T t LI thought., that the same has been set- up. ‘4

1. ne trossoo’ecnoiv; !t 1! iett 1 i_a; 0tiei1J!ii5 I r 1flIflf I 01 r n %.I_’ I - In’ I Pvt5f C )T id r1hId I’ I ;I l 4I 1fl41 I CC P 1j III I fli f’I t;I _4 tIIt rnuhsr “a’ die e1dest jaiwluer we Men np Jrc] 4,p akwngwith deidnd.a.nts to 4 H. 15 e•ontt.naecl 1w the counsel ho the Crossaohjeetors that the e:videne.e of the plain t.l1 wa.s sotn.h I It he rappor(eu ha that it his tattler who was examined as PW2 aiai a. close frIend of lite piain hif w ho was exam inch a.s dPI/fr.

1.be.re I t tOt K h IJ oe u IIJIIIZ 1111’ flhjr 1-3tl rII1 11 t 1I I ? 11 1 1 Itr& aoinuLftx.n S[OUt.lfli j i I ;;; ‘:1)1(4 existence soLes me !Pri!0!00C ii tee ..H * 3 It - I — II I ;I I I I - I j - I 1 1 (fl (fl * I InliflIl II 41 I ‘e’a I :fl Ifl — -1 - 1 1 serva.nL If:herF. Vtfl4s no 1l1:denefldent ‘fl4-t Ierrti ii estahuish i!ie.i tI i_Ta taana’aonr”a “ :1 ii ‘cc filet 1; ( 04 It -‘ lp I Ra.ne.annna,. ‘3 Go a onsiotrahon oIL LOose con i.ciii...ions and. horn •a close examination of the recorch insoi.imr •as the findhw ol.. the (nat coon i.nat oie p’ain 0 d I nan toe son . o nanorn io.in noon ma online anon 41kF oau.omer ifl’0a lJj}€J. is cOfict-flieci, i..iie rea.soniniz 01 the [nat. court Lhat the evio.enee I ad ,d ha the• S

41.11001.1 1405 ocegt.ale o nsyj I I I issue no. i I neoaro S #fltTATIAfl-’% TIInA nc1nt “n ae’ 1 ten pp trfl Rangamma and Liw• plain Uhf in turn branu her son, cannot be 1’ S. _Iune0 S I ne “e!ePOJfl5 rnjQ nIl! I • I ( flY I I 1’ rIJItn U 10 I stabhsh in iL. ucen!rrtn except vie etninenI id ct o’ !00 ieienuarts macmi Os Lee thorn of ‘ne piaintfl is concerned [he .isseninn of vht pl inittil IhaI LOt- cnl[ sehednie pr Iflt-riIe npIe 1o Mu”” appa aid toes “crc a” rmrchsed ‘n t in’ or Ranganima is We basis r’as for the p’ain Emil La Part esta.bhshed this premise The irround sourht to be raised in the I a ann an “-sue t-ckS “o tie, ii num I- •I I I ‘e “ , i n rcgari oio sLit prncuuc me Plâl1iOU iY ‘iM secilang lacoiporatlon 01 I * such an issue and more signihcanthc the nhiindff i.n his evidence t S V , t a e @ P 7 z , 1 9 I r I 1 i r I 1 . 1 ’ C 3 * 1 i w o p ‘ - ’ e b - 1 I — — i c I — , 7 5 1 S 3 4 _ ’ L I t e a r ‘ a I ’ C * S — - 0 ‘ a I S 1 . T i T t4 C : • a “ 1 . 1 $ — V pnieec ‘tJe’ ueh ‘ ‘ns a lar r - C Ire snr-p nh;cp jri’s&i mm ,nn Fn4fl fiFF J’spasd I a h rjnfvpc ,pr S P - Finn nfl: 1 1 F4fflFF F4%:t F niFPFF in F!FFF in4F4Ffl n! [F 1 FFF’[ nFFunPr iF Is not avadanie dir [be pIaiflift Is’ claim a share iheiem In LIsa L i’ ‘at e’ r t$ 14 fln fl*- fi) F a.osowte owner, nas. oeque.at.neo t.ne SflC tiiiUi 11 registerto WIll F Fl F F 2 I in r “ow ci deteruant’ t LU 5 L’ e n o’ “ic’ cct t we 9ICWCL. nas been esaauuec it ‘s not open rot we pn in”n ‘c qze4iorF ice And insora’ as 4 Scheucte prope’Ltes in concerned 0’ the same tonen ol reasoning e”en thouga the said lava 14 8 199’ is an unregistered one, the reaso’nnu or ‘he tnal ottrt as enuineness and. preof of execution, cannot be thund fau.it (a its with.. 2 c n r ‘ a’ ‘ e t r’s ‘m CJ]cs I’m m’ ta’ ‘ oug.ut i I F 110 Ot saspecteo. ‘ri I cc 151.115 nave S 101.10 InC m_11r tIPv 01.

1. 11 F F 41 court below and the reasonmg n aeeepLng die same cannot be •Jnd.lengcd wi lii relèrene.e 1..o LJn aiI.eged suspw.ioes: circuinsLances. !erenrt [Pt fl1L 1 Cr’ ijtj rt rrnej -1 ret.tsons 4IL4(Pj! !ibOVt. Irk) order as Ir carts,