✦ Karnataka High Court

SMT.MANJULA @ VIJAYALAKSHMI NAYAK v. SMT. VIJAYALAXMI NAYAK

RSA No. 1371 of 2021H P SANDESH

Case at a glance

Bench
H P SANDESH
Neutral citation
2025:KHC:18904

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. SMT. USHA JAIN W/O JAYARAJA JAIN AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT SHAKTHI NAGARA PO GURUVAYANAKERE KUVETTU VILLAGE BELTHANGADY TALUK D.K. DISTRICT-574 224. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.07.2019 PASSED IN R.A.NO.27/2018 ON THE…

Judgment

SMT.MANJULA @ VIJAYALAKSHMI NAYAK W/O VINOD NAYAK AGEDA BOUT 55 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO.2-172 GURUVAYANAKERE KUVETTU VILLAGE BELTHANGADY TALUK D.K-574224. (BY SRI. RAKSHITH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

SMT. VIJAYALAXMI NAYAK W/O MANJUNATH NAYAK AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO.2-172 GURUVAYANAKERE KUVETTU VILLAGE BELTHANGADY TALUK D.K DISTRICT-574224.

2.

SMT. POORNIMA SHENOY W/O PRITHVIRAJA SHENOY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT SANTHE ONI SANTHE MARKET, KARKALA UDUPI DIST-574 104. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …APPELLANT - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18904 RSA No. 1371 of 2021 HC-KAR

3.

SMT. JAYASHEELA SHETTY W/O KRISHNA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS TEACHER, VENKATRAMANA ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL KUNDAPURA-576 201.

4.

SMT. ASHA KINI W/O JAYENDRA KINI AGEDA BOUT 50 YEARS R/AT HIRIYADKA UDUPI TALUK-576 113.

5.

SMT. USHA JAIN W/O JAYARAJA JAIN AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT SHAKTHI NAGARA PO GURUVAYANAKERE KUVETTU VILLAGE BELTHANGADY TALUK D.K. DISTRICT-574 224. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.07.2019 PASSED IN R.A.NO.27/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELTHANGADY, D.K, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.08.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.244/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELTHANGADY AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:18904 RSA No. 1371 of 2021 HC-KAR ORAL JUDGMENT On 21.06.2024, the learned counsel for the appellant reported the death of the sole appellant before the Court and hence, this Court directed the counsel for the appellant to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record within two weeks. Inspite of the said order, after lapse of one year also, no steps are taken to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as abated. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RSA No. 1371 of 2021). ← Search more judgments