SRI. K.S. PUTTASWAMY v. SMT. KAVITHA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. CHI. BHUVAN .P. ARADHYA, S/O. PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 BEING MINOR REPTD. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER SMT. KAVITHA, (PETITIONER NO.1) - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:26666 WP No. 19440 of 2021 HC-KAR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT.NO.92…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 19440 OF 2021 (GM-FC) …PETITIONER BETWEEN: SRI. K.S. PUTTASWAMY, S/O. SRI. SRIKANTARADHYA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT SOMESWARA BADAVANE, NEAR GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, OPPOSITE YAJAMANA THEATER, HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, NANJANGUD TALUK – 571301. (BY SRI. RUPESH KUMAR S.,ADVOCATE) MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:
SMT. KAVITHA, W/O. SRI. PUTTASWAMY, D/O. S. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
CHI. GAGAN.P.ARADHYA, S/O. PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS,
CHI. BHUVAN .P. ARADHYA, S/O. PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 BEING MINOR REPTD. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER SMT. KAVITHA, (PETITIONER NO.1) - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:26666 WP No. 19440 of 2021 HC-KAR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT.NO.92, 1ST FLOOR, SATAGALLI, HANCHYA POST, MYSURU - 570 019. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 14.09.2021 PASSED ON IA BY THE LEARNED IV ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE, AT MYSORE, IN CRL. MISC.NO.230/2021 VIDE ANNX-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER A memo is filed seeking permission to withdraw this petition stating that the parties have amicably settled the disputes between them. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All IAs., in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.