BHASKARA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ss. 3(5), 49, 324(4), 329(3), 528
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8266 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
#1. BHASKARA, S/O. THIMMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/AT. AVIGE, KODANAVALLI, SULLAI POST, SHIVAMOGGA – 577401.
#2. KOLLURU SURYANARAYANA ADIGA, S/O. K.SUBRAYA ADIGA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/AT. NO.31 AMIBIKA, 1ST CROSS, A PARALLEL ROAD, GUNDAPPA SHED, SHIMOGGA DODDAPETE, SHIMOGA-577202. [NOTE: NAME OF PETITIONER NO.2 AND 3 IS MENTIONED AS PER THE AADHAR CARD]
#3. SHARATH K.S, S/O. SURYANARAYANA ADIGA.K, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT. NO.31 AMIBIKA, 1ST CROSS, A PARALLEL ROAD, GUNDAPPA SHED, SHIMOGGA DODDAPETE, SHIMOGA – 577202. HC-KAR - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:36910 CRL.P No. 8266 of 2026 CNR: KAHC010393422026 [NOTE NAME OF PETITIONER NO.2 AND 3 IS MENTIONED AS PER THE AADHAR CARD]. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI B VIJAY SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:
#1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY KOLLUR POLICE STATION, BYNDOOR TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576220. THROUGH STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001.
#2. SRI MADHUSUDHAN M, S/O SRI PURUSHOTHAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT MAHALAKSHMI RESIDENCY, KOLLUR, BYNDOOR TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT, PIN- 576220. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R-1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.27/2026 DATED 14.04.2026 REGISTERED BY KOLLUR P.S FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 329(3), 324(4), 49, 3(5) OF BNSS 2023 WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE THE HON’BLE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BYNDOOR, UDUPI DISTRICT VIDE ANNEXURE A ON THE BASIS OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 I.E., MADHUSUDHAN M VIDE ANNEXURE B. HC-KAR - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:36910 CRL.P No. 8266 of 2026 CNR: KAHC010393422026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
#2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioners in the above case most respectfully pray that, this Hon'ble court be pleased to permit them to withdraw the above petition with liberty to file fresh petition, in view of filing charge sheet in the above crime, by permitting the petitioners to challenge the said charge sheet in C.C.No.452/2026, to meet the ends of justice and equity.” In terms of the memo, the criminal petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 5 Sl No.: 1
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.