✦ Karnataka High Court

(BY SRI. SANMATHI E I AND SRI. DILIP, ADVOCATES) v. (BY SRI. K.R. VASUDEVAN, ADVOCATE)

Income Tax Appeal No. 419 of 2022KRISHNA S DIXIT, G BASAVARAJA

Case at a glance

Bench
KRISHNA S DIXIT, G BASAVARAJA
Neutral citation
2025:KHC:8030-DB

Provisions considered

Judgment

(BY SRI. SANMATHI E I AND SRI. DILIP, ADVOCATES) …APPELLANTS AND: M/S. KENNAMETAL INC., C/O. KENNAMETAL INDIA, 8/9TH MILE, TUMKUR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 073, PAN [REDACTED] (BY SRI. K.R. VASUDEVAN, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAS FILED UNDER SEC .260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED LAKSHMINARAYAN N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8030-DB ITA No. 419 of 2022 16/02/2022 PASSED IN IT(IT)A NO.35/BANG/2021, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-2018 PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN IT(IT)A NO. 35/BANG/2021 DATED 16/02/2022 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-2018 ANNEXURE-C AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE DRP COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2), BENGLAURU, ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) The subject matter of this Appeal is substantially similar to the one this day decided by us in ITA No.418/2022 between THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. KENNAMETAL INC. Like cases should be decided alike being adjudicatory norm, what has been - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8030-DB ITA No. 419 of 2022 ordered in the coordinate case would apply to this case also. Accordingly, this Appeal is also disposed off. Costs made easy. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Income Tax Appeal No. 419 of 2022). ← Search more judgments