✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI SARDAR v. SRI VENKATA REDDY

Writ Petition No. 14659 of 2020H T NARENDRA PRASAD

Case at a glance

Bench
H T NARENDRA PRASAD
Neutral citation
2025:KHC:7818

Judgment

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI SARDAR S/O GUDUSAB AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/ATN NO.82, VINAYAKA NAGAR J.P.NAGAR 5TH PAHSE BANGALORE-560078.

2.

SRI KATHAL AHAMED S/O.LATE PATHAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.55/11 12TH CROSS WILSON GARDEN BANGALORE-560027. (BY SRI. ANNAIAH C V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI VENKATA REDDY S/O LATE SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/AT NO.18, TEMPLE ROAD ATTIBELE VILLAGE AND HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE-562107.

2. SRI WAJID AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONERS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7818 WP No. 14659 of 2020 R/AT 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE 560034.

3.

SRI SNAJAY KUMAR S/O GOWHARI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.39, 3RD MAIN ROAD NUNGAMBAKKAM CHENNAI TAMILNADU-600034.

4.

SRI RAMACHANDRA REDDY S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT BOMMANAHALLI VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE 560068. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN O.S. NO.1202/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH NO.45) AND ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 29.09.2020 AND ALSO ORDER DATED 10.11.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7818 WP No. 14659 of 2020 ORAL ORDER

1. The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 13.02.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.

2. The memo is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 14659 of 2020). ← Search more judgments