SRI. AFZAL YUNUS v. K. A. BOARDS AND FLUSH DOORS, PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING IT’S ADDRESS AT
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55 . WOODLINES, A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP HAVING IT’S ADDRESS AT, NO. 37, KHAZI STREET, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU URBAN, KARNATAKA - 560004. REP. BY IT’S PROPRIETOR, SRI C. P. TASLEEM MOHAMED. …RESPONDENT/S …4 4 COMAP NO.244/2024 The Advocate for the appellant has filed the above COMAP /…
Judgment
(By Sri/Smt.: VEENA T. N., ADVOCATE) AND 1 . K. A. BOARDS AND FLUSH DOORS, PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING IT’S ADDRESS AT ANEKALLU, KADAMBAR, KASARGOD DIST. KERALA STATE – 671 232, …2 2 COMAP NO.244/2024 REP. BY IT’S PARTNERS, SRI MANSOOR KADAMBAR ABDULLA, AND MS KHADEEJAMMA, GST NO. 32AAACFK9740R1ZT.
MARQUE PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES, PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING IT’S ADDRESS AT NO. 2-508, POTTOLIKE, MONTEPADAVU, NARINGANA, BANTWAL, DAKSHINA KANNADA DIST. KARNATAKA STATE - 575 023. REP. BY IT’S PARTNERS, SRI M. A. REHMAN MOHAMMED SHAFEEQ, AND SRI MANSOOR KADAMBAR ABDULLA, GST NO. 29ABRFM4624J1ZO.
RISHABH PLYWOODS, A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP, HAVING IT’S ADDRESS AT SPECIAL PLOT NO. 1, 2 AND 3, M. T. SAGAR, 1ST GATE MAIN ROAD, INDUSTRIAL AREA, BESIDE BSNL OFFICE, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALI, DHARWAD DIST. KARNTAKA – 580 030. REP. BY IT’S PROPRIETOR, SRI RAJESH KUMAR, …3 3 COMAP NO.244/2024 GANESHMALJI JAIN, GSTIN/UIN/29ADQPGO116Q1Z5.
GLOBAL IMPEX GLASS N PLYWOOD A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP, HAVING IT’S ADDRESS AT 1126/3-4, NEAR ST. THOMAS SCHOOL, 20 STAGE, VISVESHWARANAGAR, MYSURU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA – 570 008, ALSO AT NO. 275, 8, NEW TIMBERYARD LAYOUT, MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 026. REP. BY IT’S PROPRIETOR, SRI DILIP KUMAR JAIN. GSTIN 29AEEPJ6876P1Z.
WOODLINES, A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP HAVING IT’S ADDRESS AT, NO. 37, KHAZI STREET, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU URBAN, KARNATAKA - 560004. REP. BY IT’S PROPRIETOR, SRI C. P. TASLEEM MOHAMED. …RESPONDENT/S …4 4 COMAP NO.244/2024 The Advocate for the appellant has filed the above COMAP / Commercial Appeal under section 13 (1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act 2015, read with order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Praying that this Honble Court A. Call for entire records of the suit in Com.O.S.1463 of 2022 from the Honble LXXXIV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge (Commercial Court) (CCH-85) at Bangalore. B. Allow the Appeal and set aside the judgement and decree dated 26.02.2024 in Com.O.S.1463 of 2022, passed by the LXXXIV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge (Commercial Court) at Bangalore only in so far as it relates to the findings dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs/Appellant for mandatory and perpetual injunctions restraining the Defendants from using the trademarks of the plaintiffs as prayer for in the plaint. C. Grant such other and other reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. …5 5 COMAP NO.244/2024 This Commercial Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following order. ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) The matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. To show one indulgence, two weeks time is granted to do the needful, failing which, appeal shall stand dismissed without further orders. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 17.11.2025, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is hereby dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS Ty dt : 22.12.2025 C.dt : 23.12.2025
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.