SMT. KANTAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 215
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
Judgment
SMT. KANTAMMA W/O. LATE SAMPANGI RAMAIHA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT INDALVADI VILLAGE, KASBA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT (BY SRI. VIJAYA SHEKARA GOWDA V, ADVOCATE) …COMPLAINANT HARIKRISHNA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KARNTAKA, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, SACHIVALAYA II, NO 213, II FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 001. …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT
D.S. RAMESH. I.A.S COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD KAVERI BHAVAN, K.G ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009. - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:43867-DB CCC No. 730 of 2022
KUM. JAYA H. THE SPL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD KAVERI BHAVAN, K G ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009 (BY SRI. DEVARAJ C.H, GOV.ADVOCATE FOR A1 SRI. MANU.K, ADVOCATE FOR A2 & A3) …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, R/W SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT,1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AND PUNISH THE KHB ACCUSED FOR GROSS DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDERS DATED
19.07.2021 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.10188/2021 (LA-KHB) PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR) This contempt proceeding is initiated under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for willful disobedience of - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:43867-DB CCC No. 730 of 2022 the order passed by the learned Single Judge on the writ side in W.P.Nos.10188/2021 dated 19.07.2021 as per Annexure-A.
2. Learned counsel, namely, Sri Vijaya Shekara Gowda V., for the complainant is present before the Court physically. Similarly, learned GA, Sri Devaraj C.H., for pro- forma Respondent No.1.
3. Learned counsel, namely Sri Manu K., for accused Nos.2 and 3, is present before the Court physically and submits that he has filed detailed affidavit along with Annexure-A i.e. a copy of endorsement dated
06.11.2021.
However, keeping in view the submission made by the learned counsel for the accused so also having gone through the contents of the compliance affidavit and the endorsement issued by the Competent Authority dated
06.11.2021 vide Annexure-A produced therein, it is deemed appropriate to state that there is no consequence to persuade contempt petition further. - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:43867-DB CCC No. 730 of 2022 Consequently, the contempt proceeding is hereby dropped. Sd/- (K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.