✦ Karnataka High Court

RAJASHEKARAIAH v. SRI KOTRAIAH

RFA No. 1496 of 2023JYOTI MULIMANI

Case at a glance

Bench
JYOTI MULIMANI
Neutral citation
2025:KHC:3110

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. SRI UMESHASWAMY S/O KOTTARAYYA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF SHREEDHARANAGARA, BEHIND APMC, 3RD CROSS, SAGARA, SHIMOGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS…

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1496 OF 2023 BETWEEN: RAJASHEKARAIAH S/O GADIGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/O ARATALE GADDE VILLAGE, JADE HOBLI, SORABA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT. (BY SRI. R.G.HALESHA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. G.F.HUNASIKATTIMATH., ADVOCATE) …APPELLANT AND:

1.

SRI KOTRAIAH PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka

2.

S/O GADIGEYYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O ARATALE GADDE VILLAGE, JADE HOBLI, SORABA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT. SMT SULOCHANAMMA @ NEELAMA W/O HONDADA ERAIAH, SINCE DEAD BY LR'S, 2a. SRI HUCHESHWARA, S/O HONDADA ERAIAH, SINCE DEAD BY LR'S, 2b. SRI NADEESHWARA, S/O HONDADA ERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O SAMANAVALI 1 VILLAGE, ANAVATTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK, - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3110 RFA No. 1496 of 2023 SHIMOGA DISTRICT.

3.

SRI UMESHASWAMY S/O KOTTARAYYA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF SHREEDHARANAGARA, BEHIND APMC, 3RD CROSS, SAGARA, SHIMOGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.R.G.Halesha., counsel behalf Sri.G.F.Hunasikattimath., for the appellant has appeared in person. A perusal of the office note depicts that the value of the subject matter of the appeal is less than Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only). In view of Section 19(1) of Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964, an appeal is maintainable before the District Court. For statistical purpose, the Regular First Appeal is disposed of. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3110 RFA No. 1496 of 2023 The Registry concerned is hereby directed to return the documents by replacing the same with Xerox copies. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RFA No. 1496 of 2023). ← Search more judgments