✦ Karnataka High Court

SMT. LALITHAMMA v. SRI. K C SHASHIKANTH

MFA No. 4376 of 2024HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. SRI VENUGOPAL N S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA APPELLANT NOS. 1 TO 4 ALL ARE RESIDING AT MYLASANDRA VILLAGE, RV COLLAGE POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU 560059 (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOLE, SENIOR COUNSEL…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4376 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. LALITHAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

2.

SRI MUNIRAJU N S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

3.

SRI NAGARAJ N S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,

Operative part

4.

SRI VENUGOPAL N S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA APPELLANT NOS. 1 TO 4 ALL ARE RESIDING AT MYLASANDRA VILLAGE, RV COLLAGE POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU 560059 (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOLE, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. SAMMITH. S., ADVOCATE) …APPELLANTS AND: SRI. K C SHASHIKANTH S/O K.C CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT NO. 42252, PRESTIGE FALCON CITY KONANAKUNTE - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:33654 MFA No. 4376 of 2024 HC-KAR CROSS, KANAKAPURAROAD, BENGALURU. (BY SRI. SHREEDHARA B E AND SRI. SANJAY R, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) …RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN O.S.NO.3742/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED XXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-38) AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.05.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-38) ON IA NO.1 IN OS 3742/2023 AS CONTAINED IN ANNEXURE-A. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — r. 1(r).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MFA No. 4376 of 2024). ← Search more judgments