Lingaraju @ Ningaraju v. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 41 r. 22
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the Memo, the Cross Objector – Claimant is permitted to withdraw the above appeal. The said memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the above MFA CROB. is dismissed as withdrawn. Draw up the Award accordingly. Rbv Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA & SMT. PARINEETA S. CHANAL, MEMBER M.F.A. CROB. No. 74/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 56/2024) BETWEEN: Lingaraju @ Ningaraju, S/o Kutturappa, Aged about 55 years, R/o Seetapura Village, Madalu, Kanakatte Hobli, Arasikere Taluk, Hassan District-573 103. ...CROSS OBJECTOR (By Sri. Prakasha H.C., Advocate) AND
#1. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., E-8, EPIP RIICO, Seethapura, Jaipura, Rajasthan-302 020, Represented by the Regional Manager, M/s. Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd., No.4/5, 3rd Floor, S.V. Arcade, Bilakahalli Main Road, Bannerughatta Road, Bengaluru – 560 076. 2
#2. Bharath S/o Manjunatha, R/o Madalu Village & Post, Arasikere Taluk, Hassan District-573 103. …RESPONDENTS (By Sri. B. Pradeep, Advocate for R-1) MFA CROB. FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 22 OF C.P.C. R/W SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 09.04.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.686/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. MACT, ARSIKERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MFA CROB. COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Cross Objector – Claimant is present.
#2. The Learned Counsel for the Cross Objector – claimant has filed Memo for Withdrawal seeking permission to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed. 3
#3. In view of the Memo, the Cross Objector – Claimant is permitted to withdraw the above appeal. The said memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the above MFA CROB. is dismissed as withdrawn. Draw up the Award accordingly. Rbv Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 41 r. 22; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.