BANGALORE - 560 001 v. (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP FOR RESP.1)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 328, 506
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ss. 12, 14, 16, 17
- Information Technology Act, 2000 ss. 66(E), 67(D)
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. SMT. LAKSHMI, W/O LATE MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT: #44, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, BINNI LAYOUT, ATTIGUPPE, BANGALORE - 560 040. (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP FOR RESP.1) …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO PASS AN ORDER…
Judgment
(BY SRI. M. KRISHNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA, STATE BY CHANDRA LAYOUT P.S, RPTD BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE - 560 001 …PETITIONER Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka
Operative part
SMT. LAKSHMI, W/O LATE MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT: #44, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, BINNI LAYOUT, ATTIGUPPE, BANGALORE - 560 040. (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP FOR RESP.1) …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO PASS AN ORDER OF BAIL ENLARGING THE PETITIONER IN CR.NO.156/2024 OF CHANDRA LAYOUT POLICE. NOW IN SPL.C.NO.843/2024, PENDING BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (FTSC-1) FOR THE - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:27787 CRL.P No. 6158 of 2024 OFFENCE P/U/S 323, 328 AND 506 OF IPC, U/S 12, 14, 16 AND 17 OF POCSO ACT AND SECTION 66(E) AND 67(D) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. Memo is placed on record. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 328, 506; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — ss. 12, 14, 16, 17; Information Technology Act, 2000 — ss. 66(E), 67(D).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.