HEMANNA @ M HEMANNA v. Court of Karnataka
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the memo, the Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 306
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the memo, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE bk/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5828 OF 2024 BETWEEN: HEMANNA @ M HEMANNA S/O LATE KUMARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O 392, 14TH WARD, BEHIDN GOVT SCHOOL, OLD CHAPPARADAHALLI, SANDUR TOWN-583119, BELLARY DISTRICT. (BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR S C., ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER Location: High Court of Karnataka THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HOSADURGA POLICE STATION HOSADURGA-577528, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.RAHUL RAI K., HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.179/2024 OF HOSADURGA P.S., CHITRADURGA DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 306 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C AT HOSADURGA. - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:26747 CRL.P No. 5828 of 2024 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner after addressing the arguments, files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
Memo is placed on record.
Operative part
In view of the memo, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE bk/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the memo, the Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 306.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.