✦ Karnataka High Court

KUM. ASHWINI H.K v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Writ Petition No. 15448 of 2024E S INDIRESH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.15448 OF 2024 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: KUM. ASHWINI H.K. D/O KRISHNA H. AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT B.G. NAGAR, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 418. …PETITIONER CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. HARSHA KUMAR GOWDA H.R., ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2.

VISVESVARAYA TECHONOLIGICAL UNIVERSITY JNANA SANGAMA, V.T.U. MAIN ROAD,, MACHHE, BELAGLAVI - 590 018 REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR.

3.

BGS INSITITUTE OF TECHONOLOGIES B.M. ROAD, NH-75, B.G. NAGAR, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 418. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:12508 WP NO.15448 OF 2024 HC-KAR …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SUKANYA BALIGA B., AGA FOR R1; SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. SANTHOSH S. NAGARALE, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENS 2 AND 3 TO GIVE PERMISSION TO THE PETITIONER TO WRITE THE EXAMINATION OF SUBJECT "INTERNET OF THINGS AND APPLICATION" (SUBJECT CODE 15CS81) OF 8TH SEMESTER, B.E. COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING COURSE, WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO BE HELD ON 19TH JUNE, 2024 BY COLLECTING THE REQUISITE EXAM FEE AS PER CIRCULAR DATED 15TH MAY, 2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-D; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the relief sought for by the petitioner in the present petition has rendered infructuous.

2. Submission is taken on record. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:12508 WP NO.15448 OF 2024 HC-KAR

Operative part

3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 15448 of 2024). ← Search more judgments