✦ Karnataka High Court

MR. B.S. RAJASHEKHAR v. UNION OF INDIA

Writ Petition No. 14588 of 2026S VISHWAJITH SHETTY3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. Writ Petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to file an appropriate appeal before the competent Authority as against the impugned assessment order dated

Judgment

MR. B.S. RAJASHEKHAR S/O LATE SANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S. GEMINI SECURITY AND ALLIED SERVICE, NO. 2345/19, MUKAMBIKA NILAYA, 5TH CROSS, 2ND FLOOR, LENIN NAGAR, NITTUVALLI NEW EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE - 577 004. …PETITIONER Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY MS. LAKSHMI DEVI K, ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE, OFFICE AT JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI - 110 001 REPRESENTED ITS SECRETARY.

2.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:24652 WP No. 14588 of 2026 HC-KAR

3.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX, (AUDIT)-1, 1ST FLOOR, VANIJYA TERIGE BHAVANA, DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT, PB ROAD, DAVANAGERE - 577 006. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN A, DSGI FOR R1; SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 29/12/2025 BEARING NO. DGSTO/DVG/DCCT-AUDIT-1/GST-S-73/2025-26 PASSED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT IN SO FAR AS IMPOSITION OF INTEREST AND PENALTY UNDER SECTION 73(1) READ WITH 73(9) AND 50 OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 AND CGST ACT, 2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO WAIVE OFF THE INTEREST AND PENALTY IMPOSED IN THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 29/12/2025 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned DSGI for respondent No.1 and learned A.G.A. on behalf of the respondents No.2 and 3.

2. Petitioner is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the following reliefs - - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:24652 WP No. 14588 of 2026 HC-KAR "(i) Issue a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned 29/12/2025 bearing no.DGSTO/DVG/DCCT-Audit-1/GST-S-73/2025-26 passed by the third respondent in so far as imposition of interest and penalty under section 73(1) read with 73(9) and 50 of the KGST Act, 2017 and CGST Act, 2017 vide Annexure-F and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to waive off the interest and penalty imposed in the impugned order dated 29/12/2025; (ii) Issue any other writ or order or direction that deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. "

3. Learned A.G.A. has raised a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of this Writ Petition on the ground that petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy of filing an appeal before the competent Authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act,

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that impugned assessment order is an ex parte order, and therefore, there is a delay in filing the appeal. He submits that, under the circumstances, some protection may be given to the - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:24652 WP No. 14588 of 2026 HC-KAR petitioner and he may be permitted to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority.

5.

Said submission is placed on record.

6.

Writ Petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to file an appropriate appeal before the competent Authority as against the impugned assessment order dated

29.12.2025 at Annexure-F within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if such an appeal is filed, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same on merits without going to the question of delay in filing the appeal. Till the petitioner submits / files his appeal before the Appellate Authority, as aforesaid, respondents shall not take any coercive action till then. SD/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 14588 of 2026). ← Search more judgments