✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI. RUDRAPPA v. SMT. SUVARNAMMA

WP No. 14273 of 2026LALITHA KANNEGANTI2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Neutral citation
2026:KHC:27166

Outcome

Disposed of

petition is disposed of and within one week petitioner shall

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 14273 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. RUDRAPPA, S/O. DODDA NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O NAVILEHAL VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT – 577 213 (BY SRI. H DEVENDRAPPA, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND:

1.

SMT. SUVARNAMMA, W/O. LATE KALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. NEETIGERE VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT-577 213

2.

SMT. JAYAMMA, W/O. GANGADHARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O.NEETIGERE VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT-577 213

3.

SMT. DRAKSHAYANAMMA, W/O. SHIVAMURTHAPPA, - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:27166 WP No. 14273 of 2026 HC-KAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O.NEETIGERE VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT -577 213

4.

SMT. YASHODAMMA, W/O. RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS HOUSEWIFE R/O.NAVILEHAL VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT-577 213

5.

SMT. SAVITRAMMA W/O. KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS HOUSEWIFE, R/O.NAVILEHAL VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT-577 213

6.

SRI.VEERAPPA S/O. RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O.KAGGI VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT-577 213

7.

SMT. SHRUTHI, W/O. MANJAPPA D/O. VEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE R/O.SHIVANI VILLAGE, AJJAMPUR TALUK. CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT

8.

SRI.MALLESHA S/O. VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:27166 WP No. 14273 of 2026 HC-KAR AGRICULTURIST R/O.KAGGI VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT -577 213

9.

SMT. SHARADAMMA, W/O. SHIVANAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. HOVINAMADU VILLAGE, DAVANGERE TALUK-577 213

10.

NAGARAJA, S/O. DODDA NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O C/O. NIRANJANA MURTHY NEAR POST OFFICE, THYAVANIGE VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT -577 213 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.95/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC. CHANNAGIRI. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:27166 WP No. 14273 of 2026 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER The office has raised an objection with regard to the maintainability of the petition as the petition is filed under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC, which was rejected.

Operative part

2. Petitioner is permitted to convert this writ petition into Civil Revision Petition and for statistical purposes the writ petition is disposed of and within one week petitioner shall convert the petition. All I.As. in this writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of and within one week petitioner shall

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. VII r. 11.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP No. 14273 of 2026). ← Search more judgments