✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI.NAZIM PASHA v. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE

V KAMESWAR RAO, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
V KAMESWAR RAO, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. The Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KGR*

Judgment

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO & MR. SHANTHI BHUSHAN H, MEMBER M.F.A.No.4212/2023(MV) (Lok Adalat No.190/2025) BETWEEN SRI.NAZIM PASHA, S/O ABDUL KAREEM, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.453, 8TH CROSS, ‘B’ BLOCK, SUBHASHNAGAR, SINGASANDARA, BENGALURU-560 068. (BY SRI.GIRIMALLAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR, NO.28, CENTENARY BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, ...APPELLANT 2 BENGALURU-560 001. BY ITS MANAGER. 2 . DR.AJEYA.B.N, S/O NAGENDRA PRASAD.B.N, MAJOR,(AGE NOT KNOWN) NO.3844, 13TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 078. (BY SRI.ASHOK.N.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 VIDE ORDER DATED 27.06.2023 NOTICE TO R3 IS DISPENSED WITH) …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 25.03.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.1538/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE SMALL CAUSES, MACT, BENGALURU, C/C XXII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDGE AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH- FOR 24), COMPENSATION OF COMPENSATION. PETITION ENHANCEMENT PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM SEEKING AND THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER We mark the presence of Sri. Kishor K., Senior Manager (Legal Claims) for respondent No.1-Reliance General Insurance Company Limited. 3

2.

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned counsel for the appellant/claimant (being authorized appellant/claimant to sign) and by the Authorized Officer of respondent No.1, duly signed by its counsel is filed before the Lok Adalath.

3.

The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

4.

Respondent No.1-Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4

5.

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant/claimant, on proper identification.

6.

It is clarified that the order of the Tribunal in respect of distribution of the compensation thereof has not been varied.

7.

The Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KGR*

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments