✦ Karnataka High Court

SUBHA M C v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Taking Memo on record, Petition is dismissed as

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Taking Memo on record, Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Consequently, pending I.A. is also dismissed as unnecessary. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6837 OF 2019 BETWEEN: SUBHA M C D/O CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O NO.63, 31ST CROSS 7TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 070. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND:

#1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE JAYANAGAR POLICE, REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT BENGALURU - 560 001.

#2. S.H. MOHAN S/O SHIVAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.40, 1ST MAIN 2ND CROSS, K.S. COLONY THYAGARAJ NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 028. (BY SMT. SOWMYA R, HCGP FOR R1; R2 - SERVED) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:30384 CRL.P No. 6837 of 2019 HC-KAR THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CRL.MISC.NO.7526/2019 IN CRIME NO.145/2019 REGISTERED BY J.P.NAGAR POLICE STATION THE RESPONDENT POLICE PENDING BEFORE THE CCH-71, CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.406, 420, 504, 506 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND ALSO FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.3(1)(r), 3(1)(u) OF SC/ST ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a Memo stating that during pendency of above matter, proceedings before trial Court have been closed rendering above petition infructuous.

#2. Taking Memo on record, Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Consequently, pending I.A. is also dismissed as unnecessary. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Taking Memo on record, Petition is dismissed as

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — ss. 3(1)(r), 3(1)(u).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.P No. 6837 of 2019). ← Search more judgments