SUNIL KUMAR SINGH v. STATE BY KUVEMPUNAGAR POLICE
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V JAGANNATHAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3844 OF 2012 BETWEEN:
SUNIL KUMAR SINGH S/O SUBHAN SINGH AGED 26 YEARS R/A NO.439/1 SAIMATHAPURAM, MAIDUKUR KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. SURESH KUMAR SINGH S/O SUBHAN SINGH AGED 28 YEARS R/A NO.439/1 SAINATHAPURAM, MAIDUKUR KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. SHVAJI RAJ-SIRPUDI S/O LATE VEERAIAH AGED 27 YEARS R/A NO.6/226, GBG ROAD CHINTHALAPUDI TOWN WEST OF GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. SRIDHAR RAO S/O NAGESHWAR RAO AGED 33 YEARS R/A NO.68, N G R LAYOUT ROOPENA AGRAHARA, MADIWALA BANGALORE – 560 068.
2 MURALI S/O PULLAIAH AGED 27 YEARS R/A NARASARAPETA VILLAGE GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. RAVI S/O DEVARAJ AGED 32 YEARS R/A NO.3/10/10 ATHMAKURU TOWN KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. MADESHA S/O THIMMARAYAPPA AGED 28 YEARS R/A NO.220, FIRST MAIN, 3RD CROSS NEAR ROUND TABLE NURSERY SCHOOL ROOPENA AGRAHARA, MADIWALA BANGALORE – 560 068. PREETHI SINGH S/O SAMARATH SINGH AGED 22 YEARS R/A NO.1057, 2ND PHASE 7TH CROSS, BOGADI, MYSORE R GOVINDAN S/O RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/A NO.41, 7TH MAIN HONGASANDRA MAIN ROAD GARVEBHAVI PALYA BANGALORE – 560 068. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI: MALLA REDDY B V, ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE BY KUVEMPUNAGAR POLICE K R DIVISION MYSORE. 3
ABILASH M C S/O CHANDRASHEKAR AGED 27 YEARS R/A NO.8, 9TH BLOCK MADHUVANA BADAWANE SRIRAMPURA 2ND STAGE MYSORE – 23. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: P KARUNAKAR, HCGP) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C. PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN CRIME NO.55/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN.) AND JMFC, MYSORE, AND PENDING FILING OF THE FINAL REPORT, THE PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE COURT BELOW ON EVERY DATE OF HEARING BE DISPENSED WITH, BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R In this petition, the grievance is that in respect of the complaint registered against the petitioners, the petitioners have been asked to appear on all dates of hearing and the charge sheet is yet to be filed. Therefore, the prayer is to exempt the petitioners from appearing before the trial Court on all dates of hearing. 4
2. Having thus heard the petitioners' counsel and also Sri.P.Karunakar, learned HCGP, who took notice for the respondent-State, the trial Court is directed to consider the prayer of the petitioners for exemption till filing of the Final Report.
In view of the aforesaid order now passed, the petitioners' absence before the trial Court on the next date of hearing, therefore, be considered in their favour. Sd/- JUDGE KM
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.