✦ Karnataka High Court

(BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M R., ADVOCATE) v. (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R-1)

Criminal Petition No. 6406 of 2021ANITHA2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

(BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M R., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SULLIA POLICE STATION DAKSHINA KANNADA-574212 REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:19028 CRL.P No. 6406 of 2021 BANGALORE-560001

2.

DR LAKSHMI V W/O GOVINDA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.5 NANDANA TOTADA MANE MANGANAHALLI CROSS ULLALA MAIN ROAD JANANBHARATHI POST BANGALORE-560056. (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R-1) …RESPONDENTS THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET AND FIR IN C.C.NO.378/2021, CR.NO.225/2015 OF SULLIA P.S., ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SULLIA FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 354, 509, 506 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER

1. A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners to withdraw the petition.

2. Memo is taken on record and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. GSR:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11 Sd/- JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 6406 of 2021). ← Search more judgments