✦ Karnataka High Court

SMT. MILLI T. SHAH v. SRI. VENKATESH .M

W.P No. 14077 of 2024VIJAYKUMAR A PATIL

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGAR PALIKE (BBMP) N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU KARNATAKA-560002 REP. BY ITS SPECIAL COMMISSIONER MUNISH MOUDGIL. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MALLANA GOUDA H, ADV., FOR R1 SRI. B.S. SATYANAND, ADV., FOR R4 R2, R3 D/W V/O/DTD:29.05.2024) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.14077/2024 (GM-CPC) Location: High Court Of Karnataka BETWEEN: SMT. MILLI T. SHAH W/O TARAK SHAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS NO.540, 13TH MAIN 7TH SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT BENGALURU CITY, BENGALURU-560102 PARTICULARS AS STATED IN THE PLAINT: D/O LATE JITENDRA D. ENGINEER AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/ AT NO.1440, 22ND MAIN ROAD B.S.K. 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560070. (BY SRI. HARSHITH CHOUDARY, ADV., FOR SRI. K.S. PONNAPPA, ADV.,) AND:

1.

SRI. VENKATESH .M S/O MANI @ SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT NO.57, 3RD MAIN ROAD 2ND CROSS, ASHWATH KATE ROAD KASTHURIBANAGAR, BENGALURU-560026.

2.

SMT. DIPTI R. SIDHPURA D/O LATE JITENDRA D. ENGINEER AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/ AT NO.1440, 22ND MAIN ROAD B.S.K. 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560070.

3.

SMT. SHEETAL R. JAIN D/O LATE JITENDRA D. ENGINEER AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO. 1440, 22ND MAIN ROAD B.S.K. 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560070. …PETITIONER - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:45419 W.P. No.14077/2024 HC-KAR

4.

BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGAR PALIKE (BBMP) N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU KARNATAKA-560002 REP. BY ITS SPECIAL COMMISSIONER MUNISH MOUDGIL. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MALLANA GOUDA H, ADV., FOR R1 SRI. B.S. SATYANAND, ADV., FOR R4 R2, R3 D/W V/O/DTD:29.05.2024) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 24/05/2024 PASSED BY THE XII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND VACATION JUDGE, BENGALURU IN O.S. NO.3493 OF 2024, ON I.A.NO.11/2024, AT ANNEXURE-A & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have resolved the dispute and he seeks to dismiss the petition as having become infructuous. In view of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. W.P No. 14077 of 2024). ← Search more judgments