SRI. K. BABU @ MANU v. SMT. B. BANDAVYA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 s. 24
Judgment
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 14832 OF 2020 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. K. BABU @ MANU, S/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT MATTABARLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. (BY SRI. MURTHY K, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. B. BANDAVYA, W/O K. BABU, D/O M.N. BALACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT MALLUR VILLAGE, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-A THE ORDERS ON IA UNDER SECTION 24 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT DATED 13.3.2020 PASSED BY THE VTH ADDITIONAL JUDGE BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS IN M.C.NO.15012/2020 BY DISTRICT AT DEVANAHALI ALLOWING THIS W.P AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:13806 WP No. 14832 of 2020 ORDER A memo is filed seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition stating that the dispute between the parties has been settled by dissolving their marriage mutually in terms of Mediation Agreement and the Court below accepted the same and dissolved the marriage between parties
Operative part
09.11.2021 M.C.No.15012/2020. Memo is taken on file. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9 CT: BHK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s. 24.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.