MOIS SHARIFF @ MOIN SHARIFF v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 395
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4475 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MOIS SHARIFF @ MOIN SHARIFF S/O. YAQUB SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT NO. 6, 1ST CROSS MARAPPA THOTA, J.C NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 006. by R MANJUNATHA Location: high court of karnataka (BY SRI. SYED MUZAKKIR AHMED, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BAGALUR POLICE BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 149. (REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560 001) (BY SRI. .M.R. PATIL, HCGP) …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 CR.P.C PRAYING TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN CR.NO.290/2023 OF BAGALURU POLICE STATION, BENGALURU DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 395 OF IPC, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, WITH A DIRECTION TO RELEASE HIM ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF ARREST. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING: - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:19191 CRL.P No. 4475 of 2024 ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner after addressing the arguments for sometime, seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Submission is placed on record. Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE *bgn/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 395.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.