Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- BSJNDRAKALA
Judgment
Miscellaneous First 4ppç$No 28 2009 No333/ BE WEE S S ‘45 R11a Gmha i Maid’ a i AND ar’na}ara iBy Sri. LRaja, Advocate) Appellant \ ( bv 51 i ins (. I i-i 3 ‘ii ‘5 I No Cs \lvNnro ‘—ji F I;vi (toiipIo. By S 1 H.R Re nika dvoc te for R FO 0 5 FRI .1\I 5’vCHi\r.\R F RI. \l\I ‘a oF F ‘j,i;jFkFi 0PI5\c I O\ FR) F t1< 0 H .V(TO)LN i 0’ ‘P ( i\I{’ S Respondents \AN 0 FRI (0 : IF PROC OF j . 1IFI iO\ 15 F H F: 10 FR ‘ii 00115 VIl V DI (1)0 1)0 El Iich\ 1) I (;t<F. V FOAl SC I FOOl :11 CONCILIATION ORDER Tht— loarnud POIHISCI for Uxe Api)ella)iI —(iLFIIIIJIII 000 ibe irarned or’ br I ‘0 ‘a’ a pro’
p wi Hicoi ioauucuboiis tie 100001 ‘,oli IoU iRe F)0l ( p mx ‘C d Ct’ 0 a t I Re ‘a ‘) to (Kilo (Rout ‘‘ IfI F!titIci’1(l 19’i\! ,rIij0’i U 00,11 lION lOt 11 OFFI d to 11 P 1, 1 ‘ad ‘ti H1t r 1 Id. )F 0) 1 0,t’0,H-j’R i)U’31J ‘ t000F 1’ : 1lL1 ,., .1-’;ci. 1 ‘Ia It’ 1 t’iF 1 I, a tI’ 11 3 # V
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.