RAJESH K v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In terms of the memo, the Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101. (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP) …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11829 WP No. 12190 of 2022 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 12190 OF 2022 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: RAJESH K S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/O BILLERAYA TEMPLE STREET KATARIPALYA, KOLAR-563 101. (BY SRI. PRASHANTH P N., ADVOCATE) AND:
#1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEVELOPMENT, M S BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001.
#2. DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR M S BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.
#3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYATH, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101.
#4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101. (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP) …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11829 WP No. 12190 of 2022 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE E-TENDER NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.SHIAYOKO.AHARA.SAGANIKE.2022- 2023 DTD 10.06.2022 ISSUED BY R3 AND R4 PARTICULARLY BY THE WOMEN SELF-HELP GROUPS WHICH ARE SITUATED WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE KOLAR TALUK PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo for withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioner above humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to dismiss the above matter as the matter has become infructuous and thus allow this application, in the ends of justice and equity." In terms of the memo, the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 123
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In terms of the memo, the Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.