MADHU v. STATE BY VISHWANTHAPURA POLICE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B. ADI CRIMINAL PETITION No.3640/2012 BETWEEN : 1 MADHU AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS S/O SHIVANANJAPPA R/AT SRI RAMA TEMPLE STREET 2ND CROSS, UGRAPPA BUILDING BATRAYANPURA, BANGALORE 2 SRINIVAS @ SEENA S/O MUNIYAPPA , LATE AGED ABOUT YEARS R/AT SRI RAMA STREET 4TH CROSS, BPL MANJANNA BUILDING BATRAYANPURA BANGALORE. ...PETITIONERS ( BY SRI. B ROOPESHA, ADV. ) AND : STATE BY VISHWANTHAPURA POLICE DEVANAHALLI 2 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SATISH.R.GIRJI, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL INCR.NO.67/2012 OF VISHWANATHAPURA P.S., DEVANHALLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 394 IPC. OF THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 3 in Crime No.67/2012 registered by Vishwanathapura Police, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, for the offence punishable under Section 394 of IPC.

#2. The matter is still under investigation. However, the petitioners were caught red handed and from them, Rs.5,46,000/- is stated to have been recovered.

#3. No doubt, accused No.2 has been enlarged on bail by the trial Court. However, the learned Government Pleader 3 submits that money was recovered from the possession of accused No.1.

#4. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and pendency of investigation, I find that, it is not a fit case for grant of bail.

#5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioners surrender and make an application seeking regular bail, the trial Court shall dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. Sd/- JUDGE