✦ Karnataka High Court

PRAVEEN S T @ RAMAKRISHNEGOWDA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

SUBHASH B ADI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as

Judgment

Operative part

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI CRL.P No.2390/2012 BETWEEN : PRAVEEN S T @ RAMAKRISHNEGOWDA S/O THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/AT SADARAHALLI, SHANTHIGRAMA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN ( By Sri. M SHARASS CHANDRA ) ...PETITIONER AND : STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SHANTHIGRAMA P.S. (By SRI G.M.SREENIVASA REDDY, HCGP) ...RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C. PRAYING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.59/2012 OF HASSAN POLICE STATION, HASAN DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 417, 420, 114, 366A R/W SEC.34 OF IPC. . 2 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE DM

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments