✦ Karnataka High Court

SMT NASEEM TAJ v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

SUBHASH B ADI

Case at a glance

Bench
SUBHASH B ADI

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The offense alleged is one punishable under Section 498A of Cr. PC. The complainant herself has 4 stated that she does not want to proceed with the matter. In view of the subsequent developments, I find it appropriate to allow this petition. Accordingly, the…

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI CRL.P No.2555/2012 BETWEEN : 1 2 3 SMT NASEEM TAJ, W/O SALEEM JAVAIL, D/O SHABBIR AHMED,AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT 1G ROAD, 2ND CROSS, CHRISTIAN, COLONY, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT. SALEEM JAVALI, S/O NOOR AHMED JAVALI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, SMT. SAJEEDA KHANUM, W/O NOOR AHMED JAVALI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 4 NOOR AHMED JAVALI, S/O MAQDOOM AHMED JAVALI, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 5 ZAMEERA JAVALI, D/O NOOR AHMED JAVALI, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 2 6 SMT. NASEEMA JAVALI, D/O NOOR AHMED JAVALI, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, SL.NOS.2 TO 6 ALL R/AT INDIRA NAGAR,1ST CROSS, NEAR SABA COLLECTION, HOLLE HONNUR ROAD, BHADRAVATHI, SHIMOGA DISTRICT. (BY SRI: ANEES ALIKHAN ADVOCATE FOR YOUNOUS ALI KHAN & ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES) ...PETITIONERS AND : STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MAHILA POLICE MYSORE REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE (BY SRI: VIJAYAKUMAR MAJAGAE, HCGP) ...RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P. FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 6 IN C.C.NO.18/2007 WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ACMM, MYSORE. 3 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER Petitioner No.1 is the complainant. She had filed a complaint before the Chickmagalur Town Police on

06.06.2006 for the offenses punishable under Sections 498A of IPC, 3 & 4 of D.P. Act. The same was registered in Cr.No.234/2006.

2.

During the pendency of the proceedings before the IV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mysore, in C.C. No.18/2007, the marriage between petitioner Nos.1 & 2 itself ended in divorce, and both of them have filed this joint petition for closer of the C.C.No.18/2007 as the matter is finally settled between them.

3.

The offense alleged is one punishable under Section 498A of Cr. PC. The complainant herself has 4 stated that she does not want to proceed with the matter. In view of the subsequent developments, I find it appropriate to allow this petition. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The proceedings in C.C.No.18/2007 pending before on the file of the IV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mysore is hereby stands quashed. Sd/- JUDGE SNC

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments