RAVI @ RAVI KUMAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY TURUVEKERE POLICE
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUBHASH B ADI
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, the petition is allowed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted anticipatory bail subject to the following conditions: 1) In the event of his arrest in Crime No. 79/2012 of Turuvekere Police Station, Tumkur District, the petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI CRIMINAL PETITION No.2812/2012 BETWEEN: RAVI @ RAVI KUMAR S/O DEVARAJU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, MUNIYOOR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT ( By Sri. K R RAMESH, ADV.,) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY TURUVEKERE POLICE TURUVEKERE CIRCLE, TUMKUR DISTRICT BY ITS SPP ...PETITIONER ( By Sri. G.M. SREENIVASA REDDY, HCGP) ...RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CRIME NO. 79/12 OF TURUVEKERE POLICE STATION, TUMKUR DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENC P/U/S 323, 326, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC. 2 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Petitioner is accused No.1. He is seeking anticipatory bail in respect of Crime No.79/2012 registered by Turuvekere Police, Tumkur District, for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 326, 504, 506 r/w Section 34 of IPC.
According to the complainant the incident occurred on 07.03.2012 where the complaint was filed on 27.03.2012.
Considering the delay and circumstances, I find that the petitioner could be granted anticipatory bail.
Operative part
Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted anticipatory bail subject to the following conditions: 1) In the event of his arrest in Crime No. 79/2012 of Turuvekere Police Station, Tumkur District, the petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of 3 Rs.25,000/- with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. 2) The petitioner shall co-operate with the I.O. for investigation as and when required. 3) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. Sd/- JUDGE PMR*
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.