✦ Karnataka High Court

Smt. Jayalakshmi v. Sadananda .A

Review Petition No. 316 of 2012ANAND BYRAREDDY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

petition is dismissed for non-prosecution

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY REVIEW PETITION No.316 OF 2012 IN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.688 OF 2012 BETWEEN: Smt. Jayalakshmi, Daughter of Gowramma, Aged about 46 years, Residing at No.21, Ground Floor, Sai Ramakrishna Building, No.102, 5th Cross, Coconut Avenue Road, Malleshwaram, Bangalore. …PETITIONER (By Shri. Kantharaju .L, Advocate [absent] ) AND:

1.

Sadananda .A, Son of Late Lakkappa, Aged about 58 years, Resident of No.21, 4th Main, Malleshwaram, Bangalore. 2

2.

Sri. T.K.Puttappa, Son of Late T.P.Krishna Naik, Aged about 48 years, Office Room No.21, Ground Floor, Sai Ramakrishna Building, No.102, 5th Cross, Coconut Avenue Road, Malleshwaram, Bangalore. …RESPONDENTS ***** This Review Petition is filed under Order LXVII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, praying for review the order dated 20.04.2012 passed in R.F.A.No.688/2012, on the file of the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore. This Review Petition is coming on for Admission, this day, the court made the following:

Operative part

O R D E R The counsel for the petitioner remains absent. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE KS

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is dismissed for non-prosecution

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. LXVII r. 1.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Review Petition No. 316 of 2012). ← Search more judgments