✦ Karnataka High Court

(BY SRI. NANJUNDA SWAMY N., ADVOCATE) v. NAGAMANGALA

Civil Revision Petition No. 493 of 2018R DEVDAS

Case at a glance

Bench
R DEVDAS
Neutral citation
2025:KHC:6096

Provisions considered

Judgment

1.

SRI. VENKATARAMA S/O LATE THIMMIAH @ CHINDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT GANGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK-571432.

2.

SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O HALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT SRI RAGHURAMAPURA VILLAGE, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK-571432.

3.

SMT SUSHEELAMMA W/O NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT KAVADIHALLI, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK-571432.

4.

SMT PUTTALAKSHMI W/O NANJUNDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6096 CRP No. 493 of 2018 R/AT KARIKYATHANAHALLI, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANAGALA TALUK-571432.

5.

SRI MURALI S/O LATE THIMMIAH @ CHINDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

6.

SRI RAJAKUMARA S/O LATE THIMMIAH @ CHINDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS PETITIONER NO.5 & 6 ARE R/AT GANGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK-571432. (BY SRI. NANJUNDA SWAMY N., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS AND: SMT. PUTTALAKSHMAMMA W/O NANJAPPA, R/AT GANGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK-571432. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K.SURESH KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. CHANDINI S., ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.04.2018 PASSED ON IA IX IN OS.NO.298/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NAGAMANGALA, REJECTING THE IA FILED U/O 7 RULE 11 OF CPC REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6096 CRP No. 493 of 2018 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.298/2011 was dismissed as abated on 20.08.2022. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.

2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision Petition No. 493 of 2018). ← Search more judgments